Reliability of Eyewitness Reports to a Major Aviation Accident

Abstract

Verbatim from Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons. Not paraphrased, not summarized.

There is a paucity of studies on the reliability of eyewitness reports to aviation crashes. We examine witness statements to a widely observed major airline accident to determine if reported accident investigator distrust of details in eyewitness reports is supported by empirical evidence. The extensive archival witness record (N > 300) of a wide-body airliner crash in clear daylight conditions is subjected to statistical analysis to test eyewitness reliability. Even with over 200 witnesses within a three square kilometre (1.6 square mile) area answering a binary observation question, the variance is sometimes high enough to preclude forming statistically significant conclusions about a basic large-scale event. There is no statistical difference between the distributions of witnesses that reported diametrically opposed observations; and no discernible geographic pattern, preferred orientation or optimum viewing distance. These results support the current reported practice of placing low value to eyewitness accounts of aircraft crashes.

Authors

• English, Dave Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
• Kuzel, Michael Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Keywords

• eyewitness
• witness
• aviation accident
• aviation crash
• Cognition and Perception
• Criminology and Criminal Justice
• Forensic Science and Technology
• Industrial and Organizational Psychology
• Management and Operations