Skip to content

Framing the MH17 disaster – more heat than light?

Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons · Journal article (IJAAA) · oai:commons.erau.edu:ijaaa-1078 · Published 2015-10-16 · Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University · 1 author

Abstract and citation only, verbatim from Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons; full text lives there. All credit to the authors and Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.

Abstract

Despite the reductionist analyses produced by politicians and the Fourth Estate, the loss of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was a systems accident – a product of the interactions between the actants that compose the commercial aviation system network-space. As an antidote to reductionism’s ‘fundamental attribution error’, this paper presents a systems-thinking-informed analysis of the MH17 disaster. To this end it draws on Actor-Network Theory and the work of Reason, Toft, Dekker, Hollnagel and other systems-thinking advocates. Whether intentional or not, politicians’ reductionist analyses generated political capital. European Union and American finger-pointing distracted from aviation authorities’ and airlines’ ill-advised routing policies. Russian finger-pointing distracted from that country’s economic dysfunction and adventurism. The risk-management community must redouble its efforts to publicise the benefits of the systems-thinking approach to risk assessment and accident investigation.

Author

  • Bennett, Simon A Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Keywords

  • Malaysia Airlines MH17
  • reductionism
  • blamism
  • systems-thinking
  • actor-network theory
  • Science and Technology Studies

Citation

Bennett, Simon A (2015). Framing the MH17 disaster – more heat than light?. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons ID oai:commons.erau.edu:ijaaa-1078. https://commons.erau.edu/ijaaa/vol2/iss4/4 ↗