Skip to content

Atlas / Learn / Papers / oai:commons.erau.edu:jaaer-1244

Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons · Journal article (JAAER)

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of PC-Based Aviation Training Devices and Conventional Flight Training Devices for Instrument Flight Training

Published 2000-01-01 From Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University 1 author

Attribution

This is the abstract and citation. Full text lives at Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons — we link out rather than host. All credit to the authors and Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.

Abstract

Verbatim from Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons. Not paraphrased, not summarized.

Since the time instrument flight became common, ground training devices have been used to teach students basic instrument flight skills. The skills which students learn in these ground trainers are then transferred to an aircraft during later stages of training. There are three types of ground training devices that are recognized by the Federal Aviation Administration for flight training purposes. The first type of device is called a "simulator," which is a device “that exactly duplicates the performance and physical aspects of a specific airplane" (Butcher, 1996). Simulators are multi-million dollar machines, which are mounted on hydraulic legs and have full visual displays. These machines are so realistic that it is possible for a pilot to be trained to certificate completion in such a device, with no time in an actual aircraft. The use of these devices is typically limited to airline use, due to both their initial and operating costs.

Author

  • Beckman, Wendy S Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Citation: Beckman, Wendy S (2000). A Comparison of the Effectiveness of PC-Based Aviation Training Devices and Conventional Flight Training Devices for Instrument Flight Training. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons ID oai:commons.erau.edu:jaaer-1244. https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer/vol9/iss2/1 ↗