Skip to content

The Digital to Analog Risk: Should We Teach New Dogs Old Tricks?

Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons · Journal article (JAAER) · oai:commons.erau.edu:jaaer-1325 · Published 2012-01-01 · Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University · 2 authors

Abstract and citation only, verbatim from Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons; full text lives there. All credit to the authors and Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.

Abstract

Imagine being competent and certified to fly under both visual and instrument rules in a single engine aircraft. Then imagine flying cross country, entering actual instrument conditions and having the stark realization that most of the instrumentation on the panel doesn't make sense to you. You have difficulty integrating the instruments and find yourself fixating on a select few. Less than one minute later you lose your sense of up and down and moments later you hear the stall horn, feel the centrifugal forces and only see the white, whirling shades of deep cloud immersion. Suddenly you jerk awake to realize you are safe in your bed and this is nothing more than a pilot's bad dream; or could it be?

Authors

  • Whitehurst, Geoffrey Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
  • Rantz, William Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Citation

Whitehurst, Geoffrey, Rantz, William (2012). The Digital to Analog Risk: Should We Teach New Dogs Old Tricks?. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons ID oai:commons.erau.edu:jaaer-1325. https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer/vol21/iss3/7 ↗