Skip to content

Analysis of accidents during instrument approaches

NASA NTRS · Reprint (Version printed in journal) · 19920051629 · Published 2011-08-19 · Legacy CDMS · 2 authors

Abstract and citation only, verbatim from NASA NTRS; full text lives there. All credit to the authors and Legacy CDMS.

Abstract

General aviation and air taxi approach phase accidents, which occurred during VFR and IFR, respectively over the last 25 years, were analyzed. The data suggest that there is a 204 percent higher risk during the approach and landing phase of VFR flights, than during similar IFR operations (14.82 vs 7.27 accidents/100,000 approaches). Alarmingly, the night single pilot IFR (SPIFR) accident rate is almost 8 times the rate of day IFR, 35.43 vs 4.47 accidents/100,000 approaches, and two and a half times that of day VFR approaches, 35.43 vs 14.82 accidents/100,000 approaches. Surprisingly, the overall SPIFR accident rates are not much higher than dual-pilot IFR (DPIFR), 7.27 vs 6.48 accidents/100,000 approaches. The generally static ratio of the statistics for SPIFR/DPIFR accident rates may be accounted for by little or no change in general aviation cockpit technology during the last 25 years, and because IFR operational flight task management training has not kept pace.

Authors

  • Bennett, C. T. NASA Ames Research Center
  • Schwirzke, M. San Jose State University

Citation

Bennett, C. T., Schwirzke, M. (2011). Analysis of accidents during instrument approaches. Legacy CDMS. NASA NTRS ID 19920051629. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920051629 ↗