Conflict Resolution Automation and Pilot Situation Awareness

Abstract

Verbatim from NASA NTRS. Not paraphrased, not summarized.

This study compared pilot situation awareness across three traffic management concepts. The Concepts varied in terms of the allocation of traffic avoidance responsibility between the pilot on the flight deck, the air traffic controllers, and a conflict resolution automation system. In Concept 1, the flight deck was equipped with conflict resolution tools that enable them to fully handle the responsibility of weather avoidance and maintaining separation between ownship and surrounding traffic. In Concept 2, pilots were not responsible for traffic separation, but were provided tools for weather and traffic avoidance. In Concept 3, flight deck tools allowed pilots to deviate for weather, but conflict detection tools were disabled. In this concept pilots were dependent on ground based automation for conflict detection and resolution. Situation awareness of the pilots was measured using online probes. Results showed that individual situation awareness was highest in Concept 1, where the pilots were most engaged, and lowest in Concept 3, where automation was heavily used. These findings suggest that for conflict resolution tasks, situation awareness is improved when pilots remain in the decision-making loop.

Authors

• Dao, Arik-Quang V. San Jose State Univ.
• Brandt, Summer L. San Jose State Univ.
• Bacon, Paige California State Univ.
• Kraut, Josh California State Univ.
• Nguyen, Jimmy California State Univ.
• Minakata, Katsumi California State Univ.
• Raza, Hamzah California State Univ.
• Rozovski, David Purdue Univ.
• Johnson, Walter W. NASA Ames Research Center