Human Factors Assessment of Disturbances to Scheduled Performance-Based Navigation Arrival Operations

Abstract

Verbatim from NASA NTRS. Not paraphrased, not summarized.

The introduction of Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) specifications to air traffic management has resulted in many benefits during nominal operations, including shorter flight paths, reduced fuel costs, and improved terminal area arrival rates. However, these benefits become less noticeable during off-nominal operations where aircraft are routinely interrupted from staying on PBN procedures due to disturbances such as missed approaches. This human-in-the-loop (HITL) study used multiple types of disturbance events to perturb the arrival schedule. Perturbed schedules were managed with different types of schedule adjustments, including a condition with no adjustments. The study collected data on a host of dependent variables, including human factors measures on controller workload and system performance measures such as schedule nonconformance (nc). Initial analyses showed strong correlations between aggregated controller workload and aggregated nc, as well as benefits of both automatic and manual schedule adjustments for increasing system performance, such as reduced PBN procedure interruptions. The goal of this paper is to further test these initial findings. The results indicated that an increase in schedule nonconformance correlated with an increase in controller workload at specific time intervals, and automated schedule adjustments consistently reduced controller workload associated with nonconformance.

Authors

• Sturre, Lindsay K. California Univ.
• Kozon, Thomas E. California Univ.
• Verma, Savita A. NASA Ames Research Center
• Jung, Jaewoo NASA Ames Research Center
• Zelinski, Shannon J. NASA Ames Research Center

Keywords

• Human factors
• Performance-Based Navigation
• Scheduled arrival operations