Skip to content

The role of safety architectures in aviation safety cases

Semantic Scholar · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) · 8c4d2abff30e4ae99a2bb87d06832431f7a8e87c · Published 2019-11-01 · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · 3 authors

Abstract and citation only, verbatim from Semantic Scholar; full text lives there. All credit to the authors and Reliability Engineering & System Safety.

Abstract

Abstract We develop a notion of safety architecture (SA), based on an extension to Bow Tie Diagrams (BTDs), to characterize the overall scope of the mitigation measures undertaken to provide safety assurance at both design time and during operations. We motivate the need for SAs, whilst also illustrating their application and utility in the context of aviation systems, through an example based upon a safety case for an unmanned aircraft system mission that successfully underwent regulatory scrutiny. We elaborate how SAs fit into our overall safety assurance methodology, also discussing the key role they play in conjunction with structured assurance arguments to provide a more comprehensive basis for the associated safety case. We give a formal semantics as a basis for implementing both BTDs and SAs in our assurance case tool, AdvoCATE, describing the functionality afforded to support both the related safety analysis and subsequent development activities, e.g., enforcement of well-formedness properties, computation of residual risk, and model-based views and transformations.

Authors

  • E. Denney
  • Ganesh J. Pai KBR / NASA Ames Research Center
  • I. Whiteside

Keywords

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Citation

E. Denney, Ganesh J. Pai, I. Whiteside (2019). The role of safety architectures in aviation safety cases. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. Semantic Scholar ID 8c4d2abff30e4ae99a2bb87d06832431f7a8e87c. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESS.2019.106502 ↗