NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ANC04IA025
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The inadequate quality of material in the main landing gear bogie pivot pin, which resulted in a premature fracture of the pin.
Factual narrative
On February 19, 2004, about 1410 eastern standard time, a Dutch registered Boeing 767-300 ER airplane, PH-MCL, had a landing gear component failure while landing at the Miami International Airport, Miami, Florida. The airplane was being operated by Martinair Holland, under Title 14, CFR Part 129, as an instrument flight rules (IFR) international cross-country scheduled passenger flight. There were no injuries to the two pilots, eight flight attendants, or the 280 passengers. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and an instrument flight plan was filed. The flight originated on February 19, about 0923 Universal Coordinated Time (UTC), from the Amsterdam Schiphol International Airport, the Netherlands, and was en route to the Miami International Airport. The flight crew reported to their Miami based contract maintenance company personnel that during landing rollout on runway 12, as they applied the brakes, they noted a significant airframe vibration, and a pronounced rumbling noise as the airplane slowed. During a postincident inspection, maintenance personnel discovered a broken landing gear pivot pin on the right main landing gear truck. On February 20, 2004, in the presence of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge, the landing gear bogie pivot pin was removed from the incident airplane's main landing gear bogie beam. During the removal process, a residual amount of dried grease was noted on the fractured pivot pin and associated bogie beam bushings. The pivot pin was sent to the NTSB's Materials Laboratory in Washington, DC, for a metallurgical examination. According to Martinair, the pivot pin was installed in the incident airplane in February of 2001. The pivot pin had attained 2,232 landing cycles prior to the event. According to Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, the landing gear bogie pivot pin has a 50,000 landing cycle limit. According to the NTSB Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report (NTSB Form 6120.1/2) submitted by Martinair, the incident airplane had accumulated a total time of 63,592.6 flight hours. The most recent A check inspection was accomplished on February 12, 2004, 103.3 hours before the incident. According to Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, the landing gear bogie pivot pin should be lubricated during the A-check inspection. A senior materials engineer from the NTSB's Materials Laboratory reported that most of the chromium plating was missing from the pin's shank, and the underlying steel was worn, corroded, and displayed signs of heat damage. He noted that the originating fracture region contained corrosion pits. The fracture features noted are typical of stress corrosion cracking. A complete copy of the NTSB's materials laboratory factual report is included in the public docket for this incident. The airplane's flight data recorder (FDR) was removed and shipped to the NTSB's Washington, DC, laboratory for analysis. The FDR readout showed that the incident landing was within normal operating tolerances. According to Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, nine operators of Boeing 767 airplanes reported ten additional pivot pin fractures, with six of the fractures being reported within the last two years. On January 20, 2004, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group issued a fleet team digest (FTD) notice to operators of Boeing 767 airplanes, addressing cracked pivot pins, and the importance of correct grease usage. Boeing updates the FTD regularly, with the latest revision released December 16, 2004. In addition, the fleet team digest notice states, in part: "Boeing plans to release service bulletin 767-32A0199 which recommends that current pivot pins be replaced at overhaul, or heavy maintenance (D) check. SB release is currently planned for April-2004, based on availability of new pins." On April 8, 2004, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group issued Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 767-32A0199, which requires the replacement of the current pivot pins with pivot pins made of a different type of steel called Aermet 100. According to Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Aermet 100 is more resistant to heat damage, and less susceptible to stress corrosion cracking. The Safety Board shipped the FDR to Martinair in Holland on March 4, 2004. At the request of Martinair, the fractured landing gear bogie pivot pin was shipped to the Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Seattle, Washington, on August 31, 2004. The flight crew of a Dutch registered Boeing 767-300 ER airplane reported that during landing rollout, as they applied the brakes, they noted a significant airframe vibration, and a pronounced rumbling noise. During a postincident inspection, maintenance personnel discovered a broken landing gear pivot pin on the right main landing gear truck. The landing gear bogie pivot pin was removed from the incident airplane's main landing gear bogie beam. A residual amount of dried grease was noted on the fractured pivot pin and associated bogie beam bushings. A senior materials engineer from the NTSB's Materials Laboratory reported that most of the chromium plating was missing from the pin's shank, and the underlying steel was worn, corroded, and displayed signs of heat damage. He noted that the originating fracture region contained corrosion pits. The fracture features noted are typical of stress corrosion cracking. The airplane's flight data recorder (FDR) showed that the incident landing was within normal operating tolerances. On April 8, 2004, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group issued Alert Service Bulletin 767-32A0199, which requires the replacement of the current pivot pins with pins made of a different type of steel. According to Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, the new steel is more resistant to heat damage, and less susceptible to stress corrosion cracking. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2004_ANC04IA025.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗