ANC99LA018
1998-12-19 · ANCHORAGE, Alaska, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport MRI
N4185P has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (CESSNA A185E, built 1970), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A loss of engine power due to fuel contamination. A factor associated with the accident was the pilot's failure to maintain directional control.
Factual narrative
On December 19, 1998, about 1515 Alaska standard time, a wheel equipped Piper PA-23-160 airplane, N4185P, sustained substantial damage during takeoff from Merrill Field, Anchorage, Alaska. The airplane was being operated as a visual flight rules (VFR) maintenance ferry flight under Title 14, CFR Part 91, when the accident occurred. The solo airline transport pilot received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed. During an interview with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge on December 21, the pilot reported that he was attempting to ferry the airplane to the Anchorage International Airport, located about 3 miles from Merrill Field. He stated that the airplane did not have a current annual inspection, and that he had obtained an FAA ferry permit for the one-time maintenance ferry flight. He added that the airplane had not been operated for about two months, and that the airplane was stored outside with the main fuel tanks about 3/4 full. The pilot reported that during the initial climb from runway 24, about 100 feet above the runway, engine power was lost on the right engine, followed by a surge in engine power, and then total loss of power on the right engine. The pilot stated that the airplane had progressed beyond a point where he could safely abort the takeoff, and he elected to continue the takeoff with one engine operating. He said that he was unable to maintain altitude, airspeed, and directional control due to the inoperative engine on the right side, and made a forced landing. The pilot sustained a head injury as a result of the accident, and was unable to provide any further information concerning the accident. A multiengine airplane rated pilot witnessed the accident airplanes departure to the west, and said the flight path was "very low and slow, and the airplane appeared to be flying sideways while it made a right turn." The witnesses noted that the left engine was operating at a very high power setting, and the right propeller was rotating very slowly. The airplane descend into a railroad maintenance yard, struck a power line, and a maintenance tool shed. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, wings, and tail. The National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge visited the accident scene on December 22, and examined the airplane wreckage. The right wing fuel tank was extensively damaged, and breached. A fuel sample was obtained from the right gascolator, and right carburetor float bowl. The sample taken from the right gascolator appeared light yellow in color, and exhibited trace amounts of visible contaminants. The sample taken from the right carburetor float bowl appeared dark yellow in color, and also contained trace amounts of visible contaminates. A laboratory analysis was unattainable due to the limited quantity of fuel available for collection. On December 31, 1998, an examination of the right engine carburetor was conducted at The Accessory Shop, Inc., Anchorage, Alaska. The examination revealed that the needle valve retaining clip was installed backwards, and the measured float drop was 1/16 inch below acceptable limits. The inlet fuel screen was removed from the carburetor body. The screen contained fibrous material. Review of the right engine logbooks disclosed that the engine accrued 1,852.7 hours since being overhauled. Since the overhaul, the number three, and number four engine cylinders were changed after the engine had accrued 443.1 hours. On January 7, 1999, an engine examination was conducted at B.J. Custom Aircraft Engines, Inc., Palmer, Alaska. Disassembly exposed the following engine anomalies: Removal of the number two rocker valve cover revealed that the exhaust valve cap was found loose within the valve cap area. Witness marks matching the size and shape of the loose valve cap were noted on the inside of the rocker cover. Removal of the number three and four rocker covers revealed that the both exhaust valve caps were missing. There were no witness marks noted on the rocker covers. Both magnetos produced spark at all terminals upon hand rotation. Both propeller blades were in the feathered position. The airline transport pilot was attempting to ferry the airplane to the Anchorage International Airport, located about 3 miles from Merrill Field. He stated that the airplane did not have a current annual inspection, and that he had obtained an FAA ferry permit for the one-time maintenance ferry flight. He added that the airplane had not been operated for about two months, and that the airplane was stored outside with the main fuel tanks about 3/4 full. The pilot reported that during the initial climb from runway 24, about 100 feet above the runway, engine power was lost on the right engine, followed by a surge in engine power, and then total loss of power on the right engine. He stated that the airplane had progressed beyond a point where he could safely abort the takeoff, and he elected to continue the takeoff with one engine operating. He said that he was unable to maintain altitude, airspeed, and directional control due to the inoperative engine on the right side, and made a forced landing. The airplane descended into a railroad maintenance yard, struck a power line, and a maintenance tool shed. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, wings, and tail. A fuel sample taken from the airplane wreckage exhibited visible contaminants. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_ANC99LA018.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel contamination, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.