ATL04LA087
2004-03-28 · Bay Minette, Alabama, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 1R8
N605AM has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC MK30), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's inadequate inflight decision which resulted in continued VFR flight into IMC conditions, and his failure to maintain clearance which resulted in a collision with trees. A factor was the fog.
Factual narrative
On March 28, 2004, at 0315 central standard time, an Aircraft MFG Alarus CH2T home built airplane, N605AM, registered to Aircraft Manufacturing & Developing Company, operated by Phil's Flying Enterprises, Inc., and flown by a commercial pilot, collided with trees while maneuvering for an approach to Bay Minette Municipal Airport in Bay Minette, Alabama. The flight was operated under the provisions of Title 14, CFR Part 91, and visual flight rules (VFR). Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the flight. The pilot received minor injuries, the passenger received serious injuries, and the airplane sustained substantial damage. The flight originated from Marietta Cobb County - McCollum Airport in Marietta, Georgia, on March 27, 2004 at 2315 eastern standard time. According to the pilot, he received a weather briefing from the Federal Aviation Administration and stated that the reported conditions were sky clear, unlimited visibility and VFR was recommended en route from McCullum Airport in Marietta, Georgia to Fairhope, Alabama, his intended destination. The pilot said that they departed McCullum Airport at about 2315 and received flight following from Atlanta approach enroute to Fulton County airport in Atlanta, Georgia and arrived at about 2330. The airplane's fuel was topped off with about eight gallons of 100LL aviation fuel bringing the airplane usable fuel level to 26 gallons. The pilot and passenger departed Fulton County Airport at about 2345 enroute to Fair Hope, Alabama. The pilot stated that he called a friend in Fairhope just prior to departure and the friend reported that the sky was clear and the visibility was unlimited. The pilot stated that the trip to Fairhope was unremarkable. Upon arriving at Fairhope, the pilot noticed that fog had become increasingly worse and that he could not land VFR. The pilot contacted Houston Approach and advised them that he was diverting to Bay Minette Municipal Airport. Upon arrival at Bay Minette, he found the weather conditions similar to Fairhope. The pilot stated that he had used his reserve and had about 20 minutes of fuel remaining. The pilot stated that he made a low approach into Bay Minette and discovered that the fog was extremely dense and at about 150 feet above ground level, the pilot executed a go-around and was now going to attempt the VOR runway 080 approach. He said he made this approach but could only see the Runway End Identifier Lights and executed a second go-around. On his third approach at about 15 feet above ground level, he heard something strike the airplane like a pine tree, he then heard a loud thump on the right side and then suddenly hit the ground and impacted a tree on the left side, damaging both wings, firewall and all three landing gear. The pilot did not report a mechanical problem with the airplane during the flight. . Weather data was recovered from the nearest observation facility at Mobile Downtown Airport, in Mobile, Alabama, 20 miles northwest of the accident site. The surface weather observation at 0400 was: winds 0000 knots, visibility 1/4 statute mile in fog, overcast 300 feet , temperature 16 degrees Celsius, dew point 16 degrees Celsius and barometric pressure of 30.17 inches of mercury. Upon arriving at the destination airport the pilot discovered that instrument weather conditions existed. The pilot elected to divert to another airport where weathers conditions were thought to be better. When the visual flight arrived at the uncontrolled airport, the pilot again discovered reduced visibility and foggy conditions. According to the pilot, he attempted two visual approaches to land but executed go-arounds because of reduced weather conditions. However, at about 15 feet above the ground, on the third approach to land, the pilot recalled hearing something striking the airplane, he felt a thump as the airplane collided with trees and the ground. No mechanical problems with the airplane were reported by the pilot. According to the pilot, during the preflight weather briefing visual weather conditions were forecast for the entire flight. The pilot did not report requesting or receiving updated weather data while en route. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2004_ATL04LA087.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around, imc). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…