NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ATL04LA104
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to recover from an intentional spin during an attempted aerobatic maneuver.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On April 30, 2004, at 1415 eastern daylight time, a Sukhoi SU-31, N31SU, registered to and operated by Green Side Up Aerobatics collided with water off the coast of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, while rehearsing for an air show. The personal flight was operated under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91. Visual weather conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The commercial pilot was fatally injured, and the airplane was substantially damaged. The flight departed Pompano Beach, Florida, on April 30, at 1400. According to the show announcer, the pilot approached the show box and climbed to perform his first maneuver. The pilot performed the corkscrew maneuver that contained 56 consecutive snap rolls. After completing the snap rolls the pilot was excited at how many he had preformed. He then climbed to an approximate altitude of 5000 feet and informed the announcer that he was going to conduct a flat spin maneuver. According to the announcer the number rotations the pilot conducted seemed to exceed the normal amount the pilot had conducted in the pass. The spin maneuver continued until the airplane collided with the water. The airplane came to rest approximately 20 feet below the water surface and 1700 feet off the shoreline of Fort Lauderdale. No mechanical or flight control anomalies were reported by the pilot prior to the accident. The announcer has been announcing for the pilot for 3 years.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
Review of the pilot's flight records revealed the pilot held a commercial certificate issued on January 24, 1992, with ratings for multiengine land, and single engine sea. The pilot held a second-class medical certificate issued on June 30, 2003, with no restriction.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
Review of the aircraft maintenance records for the Sukhoi SU-16 revealed that the last Sukhoi 100-hour condition inspection was performed on March 30, 2004.
WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION
Examination of the wreckage revealed the wing assembly was separated from the main fuselage. The right wing assembly was separated at the wing root of the wing assembly. The empennage assembly was separated from the main fuselage assembly. The lower section of the cockpit, firewall, landing gear and engine assembly was separated from the main fuselage. Examination of the three bladed propeller assembly revealed two blades of the three-blade assembly were separated. One blade remained attached to the propeller hub. Examination of the cockpit instruments revealed that they were all damaged. Examination of the flight control assembly revealed that the elevator input control rod was connected at the control stick and traced back to the rod assembly bell-crank. The rod was separated at the bell-crank on the aft side of the fuselage. The vertical and horizontal assembly was separated from the fuselage. The aft elevator control rod was connected to the elevator assembly and control surfaces, when moved forward and aft the elevator surfaces moved freely. Examination of the rudder control system revealed the continuous cable system was separated at the turnbuckles on the rudder pedals, and bent at the separation points. The left rudder pedal stirrup was broken, and the right rudder pedal stirrup was intact. The cables were traced though the fuselage though and pulley system to the aft fuselage. The pulley system moved freely. The rudder control cable was separated from the rudder control horn. The rudder cable end fittings were bent and separated. The rudder assembly was separated from the vertical stabilizer. Examination of the aileron control tubes revealed that they were separated at the wing assembly. A one-foot section of the control tubes for the left and right aileron remained attached to the control stick. The aileron control tubes that were attached to the wing assembly were traced to the left and right aileron bell cranks. Movements on the left aileron push pull tube revealed movement of the aileron bell-crank and left aileron control surface. Movement of the right aileron push pull tube revealed movement of the bell-crank. The right aileron control link was bent and separated. Examination of the throttle control assembly revealed cable was cut for wreckage recovery. The cable was attached to its input controls. Examination of the propeller control revealed the cable was cut for wreckage removal, and was attached to its input control. Examination of the engine revealed the engine was salt water damaged and did not reveal any mechanical anomalies. Canopy control was damaged. No evidence of mechanical, flight controls or control surfaces anomalies were discovered during the post-accident examination of the airplane wreckage.
PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
The Broward County Medical Examiner performed the pathological diagnoses of the pilot on May 1, 2004. The cause of death was "blunt force trauma, and drowning". The Forensic Toxicology Research Section, Federal Aviation Administration, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma performed postmortem toxicology of specimens from the pilot. The results were negative for carbon monoxide, cyanide, and ethanol. Sildenafil was present in the blood and urine. Desmethylsildenafil was present in the blood and urine. According to the show announcer, the pilot performed the corkscrew maneuver that contained 56 consecutive snap rolls. He then climbed to an approximate altitude of 5000 feet and informed the announcer that he was going to conduct a flat spin maneuver. According to the announcer the number rotations the pilot conducted seemed to exceed the normal amount the pilot had conducted in the past. The spin maneuver continued until the airplane collided with the water. No evidence of mechanical, flight controls or control surfaces anomalies were discovered during the post-accident examination of the airplane wreckage. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2004_ATL04LA104.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Just Culture in Aviation: A Metaphorical Study on Aircraft Maintenance Students
Just Culture, a sub-dimension of safety culture, has been a prominent and debated topic in aviation safety in recent years.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Performance PRISM: A Comprehensive Framework For Performance Measurement In Aircraft Maintenance
Aircraft maintenance is governed by rigorous safety requirements and high operational complexity, demanding robust performance measurement frameworks to ensure optimal maintenance practices.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗