ATL05LA081
2005-05-16 · St Elmo, Alabama, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 2R5
N2992 has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (WATERBIRDS LLC SEAREY LSX), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's mismanagement of the fuel supply, which resulted in fuel starvation and the subsequent loss of engine power. The pilot failed to maintain airspeed resulting in an inadvertent stall.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On May 16, 2005. at 1545 central daylight time, a Homebuilt Experimental Built airplane, N2992, registered to and operated by the commercial pilot, collided with trees shortly after takeoff from runway 24, at the St. Elmo Airport, in St. Elmo, Alabama. The flight was operated under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91, and visual flight rules. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the local flight. The pilot received fatal injuries and the airplane sustained substantial damaged. The flight originated from the St. Elmo, Airport in St. Elmo, Alabama on May 16, 2005, at 1540. According to witnesses, during takeoff the engine did not seem to be developing full power. At about 250 feet above the ground the airplane banked left and the engine quite. The airplane's bank angle increased and exceeded 90-degrees. The airplane's nose dropped suddenly, the wings leveled and the nose came back to nearly level prior to the airplane colliding with trees in a wooded area. Witness, telephoned the 911 operator reported the accident, and proceeded to the scene to provide assistance.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
A review of records on file with the Airmen Certification Branch, Federal Aviation Administration, Oklahoma City, revealed that the pilot was issued a commercial pilots certificate with ratings for airplane single engine land, airplane multiengine land, and instrument rating on May 27, 1986. In addition, the pilot was issued a repairman certificate with ratings for experimental aircraft builder on July 14, 1999. The pilot held a third class medical certificate issued on June 03, 2005 with no limitations.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
Review of aircraft records on file with the e Federal Aviation Administration, Oklahoma City, revealed the amateur built experimental airplane was registered on November 17, 2004.
METEORLOGICAL INFORMATION
At 1656, the Mobile Regional Alabama weather reporting facility, located 13 statue miles north of the accident site, reported winds variable at 3 knots, visibility of 10 statute miles, scattered clouds at 7000 feet, temperature 28 Celsius, dew-point 12 degrees Celsius, and an altimeter setting of 29.90 inches of mercury.
WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION
Post-accident examination of the wreckage site revealed that the airplane rested approximately 1500 feet west of the St. Elmo Airport, in a wooded area. The direction of travel at impact was 040 degrees. Examination of the airframe revealed damage to the fuselage and empennage. The landing gear and the right and left wing also exhibited damage. Examination of the engine reveled that the engine was separated from the engine mounts. Post accident examination of the fuel tanks revealed that both fuel caps were secured and the tanks were not breached. No fuel was found in the right wing tank and the left wing tank contained approximately 6 to 8 gallons of automobile fuel. The fuel selector was observe selected between the both and left position.
MEDICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
The toxicology examinations for the pilot were negative for carbon monoxide, cyanide, and ethanol.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The fuel selector has three inlet ports (left, right, and both) and four positions (left, right, both, and off). The right fuel tank line was attached to the both port. According to Antare, the manufacturer of the fuel selector, if the selector handle is allowed to rotate to the position between both and left, the fuel output line from the selector valve is connected to both the right and left fuel tank. With only fuel in the left tank the high pressure electric fuel pumps could draw air only from the right tank and no fuel. When the fuel selector lever was rotated by hand, the detents in the selector valve were very weak and almost unnoticeable. During takeoff at 250 feet above the ground, the airplane lost engine power and collided with trees. Post-accident examination of the fuel tanks revealed no fuel in the right wing tank and approximately 6 to 8 gallons of fuel in the left wing tank. The fuel selector has three inlet ports (left, right, and both) and four positions (left, right, both, and off). The right fuel tank line was attached to the both port. The fuel selector was observed between the both and left position. The fuel selector was in a position that would restrict the fuel flow. With only fuel in the left tank and the fuel selector between the both and left position, the high pressure electric fuel pumps would only draw air from the right tank and no fuel. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_ATL05LA081.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel starvation). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…