NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ATL95FA022
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
THE PILOT'S FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY PLAN THE FUEL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FLIGHT, WHICH RESULTED IN FUEL EXHAUSTION, AND THE SUBSEQUENT LOSS OF ENGINE POWER. THE PILOT ALSO FAILED TO MAINTAIN FLYING AIRSPEED WHICH RESULTED IN A LOSS OF CONTROL, DURING THE EMERGENCY DESCENT.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On November 29, 1994, at 1705 eastern standard time, an American Aviation AA-1A, N9260L, right outboard wing panel struck the roof of an apartment complex, after the pilot lost control of the airplane, in Gastonia, North Carolina. The personal flight operated under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91 with no flight plan filed. Visual weather conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The airplane was destroyed by impact forces, and the pilot and passenger were fatally injured. The flight originated in Lakeway, Texas, with the last refueling stop in Anniston, Alabama. The flight departed Anniston, at 1300 central standard time (CST). A series of navigational logs and flight plans were recovered from the aircraft wreckage at the accident site. A review of flight plan data from the aircraft wreckage revealed that the pilot had completed a flight to Lakeway, and was on the homeward portion of the trip when the accident occurred. A search of Federal Aviation Administration records disclosed that on November 29, 1994, the pilot received a weather briefing from Greenwood Flight Service Station, prior to departing Vicksburg, Mississippi. At 1240 cst, the flight landed at the Anniston Metropolitan Airport, Anniston, Alabama. According to a Flight Service Station (FSS) employee, the pilot refueled the airplane with 18.5 gallons of aviation fuel, and departed Anniston twenty minutes later without establishing additional radio contact with the FSS. At 1700, N9260L was seen by witnesses in the vicinity of the accident site. According to an eyewitness, the aircraft engine cut out several times and finally quit. Another witness saw the aircraft's wings rocking several times, before the airplane entered a spiral like maneuver, and collided with the multi- family dwelling.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
Information on the pilot is included in this report at the data field labeled "First Pilot Information". On May 12, 1995, the pilot received his private airman certificate.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
Information on the airplane is included on the airplane at the data field labeled "Aircraft Information". N9260L was equipped with a 24 gallon fuel system. The review of the pilot's flight plan also disclosed that the pilot had flight planned for four hours of fuel endurance at five gallons per hour, and at 2400 engine rpm.
METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION
Visual weather conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. However, the pilot encountered rain showers as he approached his destination airport. Weather information is contained in this report at the data field labeled "Weather information". According to FAA records, the pilot received a weather briefing from Greenwood Flight Service Station. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION. Examination of the accident site disclosed that the aircraft wreckage was scattered over an area 75 feet long and 40 feet wide. There was additional debris from the multi-family building. The fuselage section of the aircraft rested in an upright attitude. Both wing assemblies separated from the airframe and were adjacent to the damaged apartment building. The empennage section also remained attached to the airframe. All airframe components and flight control components were recovered and examined. The examinations failed to reveal a mechanical problem or a malfunction of any of the aircraft system. The accident site examination disclosed that the aircraft right wing struck the roof of the apartment building as the airplane descended in a nose low attitude. Structural debris from the building was embedded into the leading edge of the right wing. The engine and propeller assemblies were torn from the airframe and were located on the ground between the two wing assemblies. Further examination of the engine assembly revealed that the carburetor was broken from its normally installed position. The propeller assembly remained attached to the engine, and both blades sustained scrapping damage. There were also black smears from the roofing materials on the surface of each blade. Both propeller blades remained relatively straight without chordwise damage. Examination of the carburetor assembly revealed that the mixture control was in the rich position and the throttle body was open. During the internal examination of the carburetor, approximately a teaspoon of fuel was recovered from the bowl. Only a few ounces of fuel were recovered from the entire fuel system. Examination of the remainder of the engine and propeller assemblies failed to disclose a component failure or system malfunction.
MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
The postmortem examination on the pilot was performed by Dr. Robert L. Thompson on November 30, 1994, at the Office Of The North Carolina Chief Medical Examiner in Chapel Hill. The cause of death was reported as multiple trauma secondary to the aircraft accident. The toxicological examinations were negative for drugs and alcohol.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The following is a brief summary of the pilot fuel consumption for both legs of the flight: Mr. Norris purchased 18.5 gallons of fuel at Anniston, Alabama, which is 360 miles south of Gastonia, North Carolina. His previous flight planning revealed that he had computed his true airspeed at 98 mph. Also in his flight planning to Texas, his paperwork indicated a planned fuel burn of 5 gph. During a leg of 292 miles, between Vicksburg, Mississippi and Palestine, Texas he flight planned 3+00 hours enroute with a 14 gallon fuel burn. His refueling bill revealed a fuel usage of 20 gallons, which was a higher than planned fuel consumption rate. Since the pilot did not complete the navigational logs for the return flight to Gastonia, the return altitude was not determined. Also, fuel conservation measures employed by the pilot for this flight were not determined. The wreckage was released to: Mr. Harry Brooks (Insurance Adjustor) P.O. Box 888525 Atlanta, Georgia 30356 THE ACCIDENT OCCURRED DURING A RETURN FLIGHT FROM TEXAS. WHILE MANEUVERING FOR THE VISUAL APPROACH TO THE DESTINATION AIRPORT, THE ENGINE QUIT, AND THE AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH A MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENT BUILDING DURING AN UNCONTROLLED DESCENT. EXAMINATION OF REFUELING RECORDS INDICATED THAT THE PILOT'S LAST REFUELING STOP WAS 360 MILES SOUTH OF THE ACCIDENT SITE. A REVIEW OF PREVIOUS LEGS DISCLOSED THAT THE PILOT HAD NOT FLOWN MORE THAN 326 MILES ON ANY SEGMENT BEFORE A PLANNED REFUELING STOP. THE FLIGHT PLAN ALSO INDICATED THAT THE ACTUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION FOR A 292 MILE LEG WAS 20 GALLONS; THE PILOT HAD ESTIMATED FUEL CONSUMPTION OF 14 GALLONS FOR THE SAME SEGMENT OR SIX GALLONS LESS THAN THE ACTUAL CONSUMPTION. ON THE RETURN LEG TO GASTONIA, THE PILOT ENCOUNTERED LOW CEILINGS AND RAIN SHOWERS. A FEW OUNCES OF FUEL WERE RECOVERED FROM THE AIRCRAFT FUEL SYSTEM, AND THERE WAS NO OBVIOUS INDICATION OF FUEL SPILLAGE AT THE ACCIDENT SITE. FUEL CONSERVATION MEASURES USED BY THE PILOT WERE NOT DETERMINED. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1994_ATL95FA022.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, loss of control, fuel exhaustion). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Abstract
U.S. Civil Rotorcraft Accidents, 1963 through 1997
The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has recorded 8,436 rotorcraft accidents during the period mid - 1963 through the end of 1997.
- Semantic Scholar 2016 · Article (Interacción)
Trajectory Recovery System: Angle of Attack Guidance for Inflight Loss of Control
This paper describes the design and development of an ecological display to aid pilots in the recovery of an In-Flight Loss of Control event due to a Stall (ILOC-S).
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2010 · Accident report
Loss of Control on Approach — Colgan Air Flight 3407
Colgan Air 3407 / Continental Connection (Q400) Buffalo NY, February 12, 2009 — 50 fatalities. Definitive investigation of the Colgan 3407 stall-stick-pusher crash on approach to Buffalo.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Quadratic Programming Approach to Flight Envelope Protection Using Control Barrier Functions
Ensuring the safe operation of aerospace systems within their prescribed flight envelope is a fundamental requirement for modern flight control systems.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗