ATL99LA086
1999-05-14 · HICKORY, North Carolina, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport HKY
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the landing gear actuator due to the improper installation of the lower thrust bearing by maintenance personnel.
Factual narrative
On May 14, 1999, at 0003 eastern daylight time, a Beech BE-100, N924RM, landed on runway 6 with the right main gear up, veered off the runway, and collided with a ditch at the Hickory Regional Airport in Hickory, North Carolina. The business flight was operated by the pilot under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91 with an instrument flight plan filed. Visual weather conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The air transport pilot, the right seat passenger/pilot, and the two passengers were not injured. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The flight departed Richmond, Virginia, at 2150. As the flight approached Hickory, the pilot was issued a visual approach clearance. Upon entering the traffic pattern for a full stop landing, the pilot completed the before-landing checklist, which included lowering the landing gear. When the landing-gear handle was placed in the down position, the right main landing gear did not extend. The pilot and the right seat passenger/pilot attempted several times to lower the right main gear but failed. The pilot decided to land with all gear in the up position; however, the left main gear and the nose wheel did not retract when the gear handle was placed in the up position. The airplane landed on the left main landing gear and the nose wheel. As the speed of the airplane slowed, the right wing settled to the runway and the airplane veered off the right side of the runway. The airplane came to rest after colliding with a five-foot deep ditch. A post-accident inspection of the landing gear system by the FAA revealed that the right main gear drive shaft had been sheared. The right main landing gear actuator was removed and disassembled under the supervision of the FAA. Prior to disassembling the actuator gearbox, it was observed that the input shaft could be freely rotated and the output shaft did not move. The actuator parts were sent to Engineering Systems Inc. for examination. Examination of the ring gear and pinion gear revealed that the ring gear was missing one tooth and the pinion gear, which meshes with the ring gear, had missing and damaged teeth. Examination of the lower thrust bearing and the upper thrust bearing revealed that each was heavily packed with grease on one side. The heavily greased side of the bearings would have been facing the ring and pinion gears in the gearbox. The side of the bearing marked "Thrust" should be installed facing away from the ring and pinion gears. The lower thrust bearing was heavily greased on the side marked "Thrust" and there were small chips of metal embedded in the grease. The upper thrust bearing was greased on the side not marked "Thrust." The last inspection/maintenance done on the main landing gear actuators was performed on November 22, 1996 at 9508.6 hours aircraft total time and 9,279 landings. While on approach, the pilot placed the landing-gear handle in the down position but the right main gear did not extend. All attempts to extend the right main gear failed. The pilot landed on the left main gear and the nose wheel. The right wing settled to the runway and the airplane veered off the right side of the runway and collided with a ditch. A post-accident inspection of the landing gear system by the FAA revealed that the right main gear drive shaft had been sheared, disabling the actuator. Examination of the actuator parts revealed that the ring gear was missing one tooth and the pinion gear, which meshes with the ring gear, had missing and damaged teeth. Examination of the upper and lower thrust bearings revealed that the lower thrust bearing had been installed in reverse. The type of damage the ring and pinion gears exhibited indicated that the gears were not meshing properly. A thrust bearing installed in reverse could create an interference condition between the gears. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1999_ATL99LA086.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.