BFO93GA102
1993-06-07 · MANASSAS, Virginia, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport HEF
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
FAILURE OF THE PILOT TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE AIRSPEED WHILE MANEUVERING FOR A PRECAUTIONARY LANDING WHICH RESULTED IN AN INADVERTENT STALL. A RELATED FACTOR WAS THAT THE PILOT'S ATTENTION WAS DIVERTED BY THE OPEN DOOR.
Factual narrative
On Monday, June 7, 1993, at about 1618 eastern daylight time, N824V, a Beech B24R, owned by Bernard White of Reston, Virginia, and piloted by Carlton R. Croyle of Herndon, Virginia, crashed one mile southwest of Manassas Airport, Manassas, Virginia. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a VFR flight plan had been filed. The certificated private pilot and passenger were fatally injured. The airplane was destroyed by post impact fire. The business flight was conducted under 14 CFR 91. The destination was Newport, Rhode Island. During takeoff from runway 16R, the pilot transmitted, "I'm gonna stay in the pattern once, my door just opened up." Tower personnel cleared him to land on runway 16R. The pilot acknowledged, and the tower personnel cleared him to land also on 34L. No other radio calls were received from the aircraft. The airplane struck the ground, cartwheeled and was destroyed by post impact fire. Several witnesses saw the aircraft at low altitude before it made a steep right turn. One witness who was on the ramp area at the time stated that the airplane was, "seen taxiing to takeoff with the door opened...flying slow at a high angle of attack. I saw it fly about two thirds the length of the runway.... I would estimate 100 to 200 feet. It did not climb or descend....it began to turn right past the end of the runway... began to lost altitude at a rapid rate."
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
The pilot held a private certificate with an airplane single engine land rating. His total flight time as reported by a relative was about 100 hours including 40 hours in this make and model.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
The 1973 year model Beech B24R, serial no MC 167, was equipped with a Lycoming IO 360 engine, serial no L10654 51A. The aircraft had over 1944 hours of total time, and had accumulated over 200 hours since the last annual inspection in June 1992. The aircraft was being used as transportation to conduct Navy business.
METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION
The surface weather observation 1 mile southwest of the accident site indicated the following at 1620 EDT: Sky condition, 15000 scattered; visibility, 15 miles; temperature, 79 degrees (F); dew point, 53 degrees (F); wind condition, 230 degrees at 6 knots; altimeter setting, 30.00 inches.
WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION
The aircraft was examined at the accident site on June 7, 1993. Examination of the accident site revealed that the aircraft initially struck the ground on a magnetic heading of 280 degrees. The ground damage indicates the right wingtip struck the ground first, and the airplane cartwheeled and was destroyed by post impact fire. The wreckage was strewn a distance of 34 yards. Fragments of the right wingtip and pieces of green glass were located at the initial impact point (IIP). The right cabin door was located about 24 yards from the IIP and exhibited distortion along its forward edge, but no fire damage. The left cabin door was destroyed by fire along with portions of the fuselage and empennage area. The right side of the stabilator and stabilator trim was not damaged. The trim tab actuator measured 1 1/4 inches. This setting corresponds to a three degree down trim tab deflection. The right wing exhibited minor fire damage and was separated from the fuselage just inboard of the right main landing gear attachment. The right flap was separated from the wing. The right aileron was attached to the wing. The right main landing gear was in the retracted position. The outboard portion of the right wing exhibited upward and aft distortion. The right wing leading edge exhibited chordwise crushing. The left wing was separated from the fuselage. It was also destroyed by fire. The left aileron and flap also separated from the wing. The engine was removed from the accident site and was examined further at Dulles Aviation, Manassas Airport, on June 8, 1993. Examination of the engine revealed that it had separated from the fuselage due to impact forces, and there was also evidence of fire damage. The crankshaft was seized. The propeller mounting flange was bent. Engine control continuity was not confirmed. The throttle and mixture controls were in the full open and rich positions respectively. The propeller was attached to the engine and exhibited evidence of fire damage. Both of the blades were intact with the hub which had impact damage. One of the propeller blades exhibited aft tip curling, leading edge polishing, and chordwise scratching. The other propeller blade exhibited clockwise twisting, as viewed from the blade tip, and leading edge polishing.
MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
An examination was done by the State of Virginia Office of the Medical Examiner on June 8, 1993. According to the Medical Examiner, the pilot died as a result of injuries received in the accident. Toxicological tests did not detect alcohol, drugs, or carbon monoxide.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
According to the Aircraft Operating Guide, if a door becomes unlatched inflight, the door cannot be closed in flight and the pilot must return to the field in a normal manner. The aircraft wreckage was released to the owner on June 9, 1993. DURING TAKEOFF FROM RUNWAY 16R, THE PILOT TRANSMITTED, 'I'M GONNA STAY IN THE PATTERN ONCE, MY DOOR JUST OPENED UP.' TOWER PERSONNEL CLEARED HIM TO LAND ON BOTH RUNWAY 16R AND 34L. THE PILOT ACKNOWLEDGED AND NO OTHER RADIO CALLS WERE MADE. WITNESSES REPORTED SEEING THE AIRPLANE AT A LOW ALTITUDE IN A STEEP RIGHT TURN BEFORE THE RIGHT WING IMPACTED THE GROUND AND THE AIRPLANE CARTWHEELED. EXAMINATION OF THE AIRPLANE DID NOT DISCLOSE EVIDENCE OF PREIMPACT PART FAILURE. A WITNESS WHO WAS ON THE RAMP AREA REPORTED SEEING THE RIGHT FRONT DOOR OPENED AS THE AIRPLANE WAS TAXIING TO TAKEOFF. ACCORDING TO 'THE AIRCRAFT OPERATING GUIDE, SHOULD THE DOOR COME OPEN IN FLIGHT, THE PILOT SHOULD RETURN TO THE FIELD IN A NORMAL MANNER. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1993_BFO93GA102.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…