NTSB CAROL · Event
Event BFO94LA002
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
1) THE FAILURE OF THE RAMP AGENT TO FOLLOW PROPER PROCEDURES DURING THE SERVICING OF THE AIRPLANE, AND 2) HER LACK OF ATTENTION TO THE HAZARDS SURROUNDING HER. FACTORS RELATED TO THE ACCIDENT ARE 1) THE PRESSURE PLACED ON THE RAMP AGENT TO RUSH THE SERVICING OF THE DELAYED FLIGHT, AND 2) THE INADEQUATE MANUALS PROVIDED BY THE OPERATOR CONCERNING RAMP SAFETY.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On November 5, 1993, at 1206 hours eastern standard time, a ground crew person was fatally injured after being struck by a propeller from N550TD, a Fairchild SA 227-AC airplane, being operated as Northwest Airlink Flight 3724, while the airplane was standing at the Newark International Airport, Newark, New Jersey. The airplane was not damaged and none of the 13 passengers and two crewmembers were injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a instrument flight rules flight plan was filed. The flight was preparing to depart to Boston, Massachusetts, and was being conducted under 14 CFR 135. According to the Police Division of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, three airplanes were at the gate area at the time of the accident ". . . due to weather delays of up to one hour." There were two ramp agents attempting to service the three airplanes. Flight 3724 was preparing to depart the ramp for a flight to Boston. The flight was about 40 minutes behind its scheduled departure time. According to the captain and the first officer, the victim, acting as a customer service/ramp agent, had given the "all clear" hand signal to start the right engine, and then gave the "all clear" signal to start the left engine. She gave these signals while standing in front of the airplane in view of the crew. The victim was servicing the airplane by herself during this time. After both engines were started, the captain gave the hand signal to disconnect the ground power unit (GPU) located on the right rear portion of the airplane. The captain stated that after he gave the signal, he looked at the cockpit instruments for the ". . . indication that the GPU was disconnected." The first officer was looking at his checklist at that time. Another customer service/ramp agent had just completed servicing another airplane on the ramp and walked to the rear of Flight 3724 to help the victim. According to the ramp agent, the victim appeared to receive the signal to disconnect the GPU and walked from the front of the airplane toward the rear around the outside of the right wing. She approached the right, rear portion of the airplane where the GPU was plugged in. According to the ramp agent: She disconnected the [GPU] plug from the aircraft, turned around and walked to the rear of the plane with the cord. I was standing next to the [GPU] cart that held the cord. She handed me the cord and I began to stow the cord in the cart. As I was putting the cord in, I looked up and at first did not see [the victim]. I looked and saw [the victim] heading back to the front of the plane. She wasn't walking around the wing, she was walking straight back under the plane towards the engine. I called at her. I called her name several times but she did not hear me. She had bent down and was walking right into the prop. I saw the prop hit her. A passenger seated in the airplane next to the right propeller stated that the victim ". . . walked into the outside edge of the prop . . . from rear of plane." The first officer stated that he ". . . heard a thud and the plane shook . . . " causing him to look outside the airplane. He saw the victim lying on the ground. He then informed the captain; both engines were immediately shut down. The wheel chocks were in place during the accident, and the airplane did not move. The victim was wearing ear protection at the time of the accident. According to a report of the accident by the Port Authority, "In an attempt to expedite the departure of [the flight, the victim] deviated from the normal procedure of walking around the wing." The accident occurred during the hours of daylight at 40 degrees, 41.58 minutes North, and 74 degrees, 10.11 minutes West.
PERSONNEL INFORMATION
According to the victim's employer, Precision Airlines, Inc., the victim, age 22, had been employed by the company since June 1, 1992. A review of her training records indicated that she received five days of "new hire" training during her first month of employment. According to the Director of Stations at Precision Airlines, the training included ramp safety. The training records also indicated that the victim had been designated as an instructor to train others on ramp safety. The victims's time card for the day of the accident indicated that she had began her duty day about 0500 hours.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
The airplane, a Fairchild model SA-227 Metroliner, is a low-wing, twin-engine commuter transport. It is powered by two Garrett TPE 331 four-blade turboprop engines. According to information obtained by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the engines were operating at 1113 revolutions per minute at the time of the accident.
AERODROME INFORMATION
According to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the accident occurred at Terminal "B", Satellite B4, Gate 40 area. The area is controlled and used by Northwest Airlink to service their aircraft and load/unload passengers. No jetways are used, and all operations occur outside on the ramp. According to FAA Aviation Safety Inspectors, the ramp area used by Northwest Airlink does not have any markings to designate parking locations for airplanes, nor are there any markings for passenger boarding walkways and ground crew personnel boundaries.
MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
An autopsy was performed on the victim by Dr. Shaikh, M.D., at the State of New Jersey Medical Examiner's Office, Newark, New Jersey, on November 6, 1993. The cause of death listed on the report of autopsy was "multiple injuries - accident." A toxicological examination was conducted on specimens taken from he victim by the FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. On their report dated January 18, 1994, negative results were reported for alcohol and all screened drugs.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Precision Airlines, Inc., the victim's employer, provides ramp service to Northwest Airlink by contractual agreement. Northwest Airlink is operated by Northeast Express Regional Airlines, Inc. Northeast Express Regional Airlines, Inc. and Precision Airlines, Inc. are both subsidiary companies of the Northeast Air Group. The Northeast Air Group controls several airline, dispatch, and maintenance companies. According to the Director of Stations for Precision Airlines, Inc., the following is a synopsis of the procedures used to service airplanes during ramp operations: In a one-person operation, the ramp service agent goes to the front of the aircraft (visible to the pilot). The left engine is started, then the right. The pilot indicates, via hand signals, to disconnect the ground power unit which is plugged into the area of the right wing between the right engine and the fuselage. The agent walks around the wing, disconnects the unit, and moves the unit away from the aircraft. Walking around the wing, the agent returns to the front of aircraft and signals the pilot before removing the wheel chocks from the nose gear. The agent then returns to the visible position and signals the pilot to taxi. In a two-person operation, one agent is stationed at the front of the airplane in view of the pilot, while the second agent is at the GPU near the rear of the right wing. The left engine is started, then the right. The pilot signals the front agent to disconnect the GPU. After the rear agent disconnects the unit, he/she moves the vehicles away from the aircraft. The front agent then signals that the chocks will be removed. After removing them, the agent returns to his/her original position and signals the pilot to taxi. In both procedures, no one is to pass under the wing of the aircraft into the area of the propeller. At the time of the accident, the victim began to service the airplane as a one-person operation. A second ramp agent unexpectedly arrived later during the operation. According to the Director of Stations, these procedures are taught to the ramp agents, but are not explained in the Precision Airlines Station Operations Manual and Ground Support Manual due to the differences in operations at various stations. An examination of excerpts from the two Precision Airlines manuals did not reveal any reference to remaining clear of propeller arcs or walking underneath airplane wings during ramp operations. The airline does not have a specific manual for training. THE RAMP AGENT WAS SERVICING A FLIGHT THAT WAS 40 MINUTES BEHIND ITS SCHEDULED DEPARTURE TIME. AFTER BOTH ENGINES HAD BEEN STARTED, THE CAPTAIN GAVE THE HAND SIGNAL TO DISCONNECT THE AIRPLANE FROM THE GROUND POWER UNIT (GPU). UPON RECEIVING THE SIGNAL, THE RAMP AGENT WALKED FROM THE FRONT OF THE AIRPLANE, AROUND THE RIGHT WING, AND TO THE REAR OF THE AIRPLANE. A SECOND RAMP AGENT THEN ARRIVED TO ASSIST. THE FIRST RAMP AGENT DISCONNECTED THE GPU, HANDED THE PLUG TO THE SECOND RAMP AGENT, DUCKED UNDER THE RIGHT WING, WALKED FORWARD INTO THE PROPELLER ARC, AND WAS STRUCK SEVERAL TIMES BY THE MOVING PROPELLER. THE RAMP AGENT RECIEVED TRAINING ON RAMP SAFETY AND WAS DESIGNATED AN INSTRUCTOR OF RAMP SAFETY. THREE AIRPLANES WERE AT THE GATE AREA AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT. THE RAMP AREA DOES NOT HAVE ANY MARKINGS FOR AIRPLANE PARKING OR GROUND OPERATIONS. THE MANUALS USED BY THE AGENT'S EMPLOYER DID NOT REFERENCE WALKING UNDER WINGS OR CLEARANCE FROM PROPELLER ARCS DURING RAMP OPERATIONS. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1993_BFO94LA002.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project
Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Satellite Maintenance: An Opportunity to Minimize the Kessler Effect
Recently, there has been an emphasis on the growing problem of orbital debris. While the advantages of placing satellites into space are numerous, advances in satellite technology combined with the gr…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2015 · Conference paper
The Implementation of Safety Management Systems in Maintenance Operations
Literature for Safety Management Systems (SMS) that apply to flight operations is abundant, but there is a limited supply of SMS-related literature for maintenance operations.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗