Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / BFO95LA052

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event BFO95LA052

1995-05-11 PHELPS, New York, United States Serious 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Registry · N940AK

FAA Aircraft Registry record.

Make / Model

CURTISS-WRIGHT-KITTYHAWK LTD P-40E

Year of manufacture

1941 · 54 years old at event

Engine

AMA/EXPR UNKNOWN ENG

Seats / Engines

1 seats · 1 engine

Last airworthiness date

20020716

ADS-B equipped

Yes — Mode-S AD0D32

Registrant of record

P40 KITTYHAWK LLC

Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

Loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. A factor related to the accident was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.

Factual narrative

On May 11, 1995, at 1940 eastern daylight time, N940AK, a Curtiss Wright Kittyhawk P-40E experimental airplane, lost engine power during cruise flight and crashed in a freshly plowed corn field in Phelps, New York. The certificated commercial pilot was seriously injured and the airplane sustained substantial damage. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a flight plan was not filed. The personal flight was conducted under 14 CFR 91. The flight originated in Fulton, New York, about 1930, with an intended destination was Geneseo, New York. According to an FAA Aviation Safety Inspector, the pilot stated that the aircraft was in storage all winter, and had just received an annual inspection. The pilot stated that the preflight inspection, engine run up, takeoff and climb out were all normal. He stated that the airplane was in cruise flight at 1600 feet MSL about 10 minutes into the flight when the engine "...backfire violently twice...[then] the engine stopped dead." The pilot stated that he completed the emergency checklist, but all attempts to restart the engine were unsuccessful. The pilot reported that he "...did not have the opportunity of gliding to a more suitable landing area." A forced landing was made in a freshly plowed corn field, and the landing gear collapsed. The airplane was examined at the accident site by the FAA Inspector. The examination included checking the fuel lines, carburetor, gascolator, the engine and electric driven fuel pumps. The fuel lines separated during the impact sequence. The examination also revealed that there was no fuel in the carburetor nor the fuel lines leading from the electric fuel pump to the engine driven fuel pump . The engine driven fuel pump, and the electric driven fuel pump were removed and bench checked at a test facility. Both pumps operated satisfactory when tested. THE PILOT STATED THAT THE PREFLIGHT INSPECTION, ENGINE RUN-UP, TAKEOFF AND CLIMBOUT WERE NORMAL. ABOUT 10 MINUTES INTO THE FLIGHT, AT 1,600 FEET MSL, THE ENGINE SEEMED TO 'BACKFIRE VIOLENTLY TWICE,' THEN QUIT COMPLETELY. THE PILOT ATTEMPTED TO RESTART THE ENGINE, BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. HE REPORTED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT ALTITUDE TO GLIDE TO A MORE SUITABLE LANDING AREA; THE LANDING GEAR COLLAPSED DURING THE FORCED LANDING IN A PLOWED CORNFIELD. POSTACCIDENT EXAMINATION REVEALED THAT THERE WAS NO FUEL IN THE CARBURETOR NOR IN THE FUEL LINE TO THE ENGINE. THE FUEL LINES WERE COMPROMISED DURING THE IMPACT SEQUENCE. THE ENGINE DRIVEN FUEL PUMP AND ELECTRIC DRIVEN FUEL PUMP WERE REMOVED FOR FURTHER EXAMINATION AND FUNCTIONED SATISFACTORILY. ACCORDING TO THE PILOT, THE AIRPLANE HAD BEEN IN STORAGE ALL WINTER, AND HAD JUST COMPLETED AN ANNUAL INSPECTION. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_1995_BFO95LA052.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.