CEN10LA256
2010-05-17 · Spring Branch, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 1T7
N50LP has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (CESSNA G58, built 2026), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A loss of engine power due to fuel contamination.
Factual narrative
On May 17, 2010, approximately 1853 central daylight time, a Cessna P206B, N50LP, was substantially damaged upon impact with terrain near Spring Branch, Texas. The private pilot and passenger sustained minor injuries. The airplane was owned and operated by a private individual. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The local flight departed the Kestrel Airpark (1T7), San Antonio, Texas, at 1756. In a telephone interview conducted with the pilot, the pilot and passenger were performing a maintenance test flight and were returning to the airfield. While descending through 2,500 feet mean sea level, the airplane's engine abruptly lost total power. The pilot switched fuel tanks and attempted to restart the engine but was unsuccessful. The pilot radioed a distress call to the airport, which was received by airport personnel. Due to proximity to the ground, the pilot stopped further engine troubleshooting, and elected to conduct a forced landing to an open field. A row of trees blocked the airplane's path during the forced landing, so the pilot maneuvered the airplane but the airplane impacted terrain. Damage was sustained to the airplane's fuselage and wing spar. During recovery of the airplane, the recovery crew drained approximately 10 gallons from the right fuel tank and found the left fuel tank empty. The airplane wreckage was examined by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) with technical assistance provided by Cessna Aircraft and Teledyne Continental Motors. An examination of the engine did not reveal any anomalies which would have precluded normal engine operation. An examination of the airplane's fuel system revealed debris partially obstructing the filter of the fuel mixture unit. No other filters contained this debris and the source of the debris could not be determined. The fuel lines were opened and absent of fuel from the auxiliary fuel pump to the fuel manifold. Fuel was found within the fuel manifold. No other anomalies were discovered with the airframe. The examination of the engine did not reveal any anomalies which would have precluded normal engine operations. A review of data downloaded from the GPS unit revealed that the pilot departed the airport at 1756 and flew towards Hondo, Texas, before heading north to Boerne, Texas, before attempting to return to 1T7. The last GPS point recorded a speed of 65 knots, 68 feet above ground level descending approximately 700 feet per minute. The airplane maintenance records were not recovered during this investigation. The most recent annual inspection could not be determined. The owner did not return a NTSB Form 6120.1 prior to the completion of this investigation. The pilot and passenger were returning to the airport after performing a maintenance test flight. While descending through 2,500 feet mean sea level, the airplane's engine abruptly lost total power. The pilot switched fuel tanks and attempted to restart the engine but was unsuccessful. He then selected an open area and performed a forced landing. During the landing the airplane impacted terrain resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage and wing spar. During recovery of the airplane, the recovery crew drained approximately 10 gallons from the right fuel tank and found the left fuel tank empty. An examination of the airplane's fuel system revealed debris partially obstructing the filter of the fuel mixture unit. No other filters contained this debris and the source of the debris could not be determined. The fuel lines were opened and absent of fuel from the auxiliary fuel pump to the fuel manifold. Fuel was observed within the fuel manifold. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Power plant-(general)-Not specified
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_CEN10LA256.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel contamination, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…