CEN10LA274
2010-05-28 · Granbury, Texas, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 0TX1
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The loss of control for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On May 28, 2010, about 1230 Central Daylight Time, a kit-built, Vans RV-6A airplane, N226MH, sustained substantial damage when it collided with terrain following a loss of control, during an approach to the Pecan Plantation Airport (0TX1), Granbury, Texas. The airplane was registered to and operated by a private individual. The private pilot was fatality injured, and the passenger was seriously injured. The personal cross-country flight departed the Front Range Airport (FTG), Denver, Colorado, at an unknown time, and was operating under Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions (VFR) prevailed at the time of the accident. Several witnesses reported that they saw the airplane enter the downwind pattern for 0TX1. During the final approach leg, the airplane’s left wing dropped and the airplane entered a steep descending bank, before impacting the terrain. The responding Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector reported that fuel was present on site, and that all major components of the airplane were accounted for. In a telephone interview with the NTSB Investigator in Charge (IIC), the passenger stated that she couldn’t recall details of the accident. However, she did recall that they were “slightly high” on the approach, and the pilot said, “no, no,” prior to the airplane impacting the trees. The wreckage was recovered and transported to a secure facility. An examination of the wreckage was conducted on September 3, 2010, by the NTSB Investigator in Charge (IIC). The Hobbs flight hour meter read 625.2 hours. Flight control continuity was established from the control stick to each of the respected flight control surfaces. Additionally, continuity was established from the rudder pedals to the rudder. The flap actuator was in the retracted position corresponding to flaps down (extended). An examination of the electrical fuses for the airplane revealed that the electrically driven fuel pump and strobes fuses were both “blown”. A visual inspection of the engine failed to identify any pre-impact discrepancies. The Aero Sport Power, O-360 engine was equipped with an electronic ignition system. Both the mixture and throttle control linkages were attached to their respective attachment points on the carburetor. The fuel filter screen, located in the carburetor, appeared in good shape and was absent of any dirt or contaminates. The Hartzell, constant-speed, two-bladed propeller was broken off at the crankshaft flange; with 45-degree shear-lip edges. One of the blades was twisted, about a foot from the tip, towards the cambered side of the blade. The other blade appeared relatively straight but was heavily polished on the non-camber side, for about a foot near the tip. Both blades had leading edge nicks. A review of the aircraft maintenance records revealed the last condition inspection was conducted on July 12, 2009, with an hour meter reading of 502.5 hours. Additionally, on January 24, 2010, the back-up battery was replaced at 570.1 hours. The pilot held a private pilot license for airplane, single-engine land and instrument airplane. Additionally, the pilot held an experimental, repairman’s certificate. The pilot's third class medical was conducted on September, 2008. The flight log for the pilot was not located; however, the accident pilot reportedly had about 1,100 to 1,200 total hours and about 625 hours in the accident airplane. The FAA Toxicology Accident Research Library, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, conducted toxicological testing. The pilot tested positive for Etomidate and Lidocaine. However, the autopsy conducted by the Office of Chief Medical Examiner, Tarrant County Medical Examiner District, Tarrant County, Texas noted; "documented evidence of medical intervention” on the pilot. The pilot and passenger were on the final approach to their destination airport, after completing about a 550-nautical mile, cross-country flight in a kit-built airplane. During the approach, the left wing dropped and the airplane entered a steep descending bank before impacting the terrain. The surviving passenger could not recall details of the accident. A postaccident examination of the airframe and engine wreckage did not reveal any abnormalities that would have precluded normal operation. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_CEN10LA274.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (loss of control, maintenance). All research papers
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2002 · Accident report Loss of Control and Impact with Pacific Ocean — Alaska 261
Alaska Airlines Flight 261 (MD-83) Pacific Ocean, January 31, 2000 — 88 fatalities. Definitive investigation of the Alaska 261 pitch-runaway-and-loss-of-control crash.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.