CEN10LA281

Factual narrative

On May 29, 2010, about 1030 central daylight time, a single-engine Cessna 140 airplane, N76287, received substantial damage after a forced landing following a loss of engine power shortly after takeoff from the Amelia Earhart Airport (K59), Atchison, Kansas. The commercial rated pilot, sole occupant, was not injured. The airplane was registered to and operated by a private individual. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. In a telephone interview with the pilot, he stated that he had just departed K59, when the engine “just quit.” He stated that he applied carburetor heat, and switched (fuel) tanks, to no avail. He then elected to conduct a force landing on a nearby road. During the hard landing the airplane’s landing gear collapsed, and the airplane impacted and came to rest in a ditch. An examination of the airplane was conducted by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector. The inspector reported that fuel was visible in the left wing fuel tank; however, the amount of fuel in right wing fuel tank could not be verified, due to the way the airplane was sitting without its landing gear. Fuel sumped from each tank appeared clean and free of contaminates. Additionally, fuel was found in the engine’s carburetor. The engine was rotated by hand and continuity thought the engine was verified. Both left and right magneto’s appeared to function properly. A review of the information found on a Carburetor Icing Probability Chart; and given the atmospheric conditions prevailing during take-off, revealed that the airplane was operating within the "moderate or serious icing - cruise or descent power" range. A reason for the loss of engine power was not determined. During takeoff the airplane's engine suddenly lost power. The pilot applied carburetor heat and switched fuel tanks; however, the engine did not restart. The pilot elected to conduct a forced landing along a road. During the forced landing, the airplane sustained structural damage. An examination of the airplane and engine was conducted; however, no abnormalities were found with either the airframe or engine that could account for the loss of engine power. While weather conditions for carburetor icing were noted as “moderate or serious icing - cruise or descent power range” at the time of the accident, the investigation was unable to determine the cause of the power loss. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12

NTSB Findings

FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.

• C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-(general)-(general)-Not specified - C
• — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Temp/humidity/pressure-Conducive to carburetor icing-Not specified