CEN10LA302
2010-06-03 · Fort Worth, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport AFW
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the nose gear actuator due to insufficient lubrication of the nut assembly threads.
Factual narrative
On June 3, 2010, approximately 1430 central daylight time, a Beech C90, N20, registered to and operated by the Federal Aviation Administration, was substantially damaged when the nose landing gear collapsed on landing at Alliance Fort Worth Airport (AFW), Fort Worth, Texas. Visual meteorological conditions (VMC) prevailed at the time of the accident. The training flight was being conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 without a flight plan. The two pilots on board the airplane were not injured. The local flight originated at 1305 from AFW. The purpose of the flight was to maintain inspector currency. After completion of air work, the airplane proceeded to Waco (ACT), Texas, where takeoffs and landings were to be made. As the landing gear was extended during the first approach, the crew heard a loud "bang" and observed a GEAR UNSAFE indication. After making a low pass ACT tower reported the main gear appeared to be down, but the nose gear was only partially extended. The instructor raised the landing gear and made another low pass. Tower personnel said the main gear was up, but the nose gear was still only partially extended. The crew returned to AFW and, after consulting with FSDO, Oklahoma City maintenance, and Hawker Beechcraft, the decision was made to land the airplane on runway 34L. As speed dissipated, the nose gear folded and the airplane slid to a stop. The nose wheel bulkhead was damaged. Post-accident examination revealed the nose gear actuator (p/n 50-820208-5, s/n 93963) had failed. The actuator was sent to Aerospace Turbine Rotables, Inc., Wichita, Kansas, where it was disassembled and examined. According to their Teardown and Inspection Report, “The most probable root cause of the actuator failure was relevant to insufficient lubrication of the nut assembly threads.” According to FAA, Hawker Beechcraft maintenance manual does not require in-service lubrication of landing gear actuator. The mechanical actuator is suppose to be overhauled or replaced every 8000 cycles, or 6 years, whichever occurs first. During this time, the screw and nut assembly is to be greased. FAA said that the actuator on N20 accrued 1,576 and 951.2 hours time-in-service before it failed. Hawker Beechcraft confirmed that there was no requirement for lubricating the landing gear actuator. Consequently, the company reported it had implemented a change to the King Air maintenance manual that will include a lubrication requirement for the screw and nut assembly. As the landing gear was extended, the flightcrew heard a loud "bang" and observed a “Gear Unsafe” indication. After making a low pass, tower personnel reported that the main gear appeared to be down but that the nose gear was only partially extended. The certificated flight instructor raised the landing gear and made another low pass. Tower personnel said the main gear was up, but the nose gear was still only partially extended. The flightcrew elected to return to their home base and land. As speed dissipated, the nose gear folded and the airplane slid to a stop. A postaccident examination revealed that the nose gear actuator had failed due to insufficient lubrication of the nut assembly threads. The manufacturer recommends that the actuator be overhauled or replaced every 8000 cycles, or 6 years, whichever occurs first. At this time, the screw and nut assembly is to be greased. The failed actuator had accrued 1,576 cycles and 951.2 hours time-in-service. The maintenance manual does not require in-service lubrication of landing gear actuator. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Landing gear actuator-Failure - C
- C Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Grease-Fluid level - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_CEN10LA302.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…