NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN10LA425
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation as a result of the pilot’s improper fuel management. Contributing to the accident were the critical fuel placards that were difficult to see due to the airplane's paint scheme.
Factual narrative
On July 22, 2010, approximately 1100 central daylight time, a Smith Aerostar 601P, N601AT, was substantially damaged when both engines lost power and the pilot was forced to land in a plowed field 2 miles south of Cleburne (CPT), Texas. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The ferry flight was being conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 without a flight plan. The pilot, the sole occupant on board, sustained minor injuries. The cross-country flight originated at CPT, and was en route to Mena (MEZ), Arkansas. According to the pilot's accident report, he cycled both fuel selectors and "they both sounded normal through the 3 positions." He found the left engine starter drive engaged, "like someone tried to start (it) and it didn't start." The fuel sumps were drained. During the takeoff, "the fuel pressure came up a couple of pounds when turning on boost pumps, rpm came up to just above 2550, and manifold (pressure) came up to about 30.5 (inches), then back to 29.5 (inches) approximately. After takeoff and upon reaching 700 to 800 feet, the pilot retracted the landing gear and the right engine started losing power. The pilot wrote, "I turned off the boost pump. No power. Turned it back on. Switched to crossfeed on the right. Both boost pumps on. Still no power. Went back to on. Then the left engine lost power. The pilot steered towards the nearest open field "and was barely able to avoid an automobile and trees and keep from stalling." The airplane impacted terrain near the intersection of Highway 171 and Johnson County Road 312. A television news photo showed a circumferential crack in the airplane's fuselage near the aft pressure bulkhead. According to the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) and Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA1608NM (Mechen, Inc.), the airplane was equipped with four fuel tanks: integral wet fuel tanks located, in each wing outboard of the engine nacelle (65 gallons total, 62 gallons usable); a rectangular bladder-type fuel tank, located between the rear cabin bulkhead and the forward bulkhead of the baggage compartment (43.5 gallons total, 41.5 gallons usable); an integral metal auxiliary fuel tank, located in the forward section of the baggage compartment (45 gallons total, 44 gallons usable). The airplane was capable of carrying 218.5 gallons of fuel, 209.5 gallons of which were usable. In his accident report, the pilot said he filled the fuselage tank to capacity, 20 gallons was placed in the auxiliary tank, and 25 gallons was placed in each wing tank (a total of 113.5 gallons). The pilot said there was a total of 131 gallons on board. An FAA inspector who went to the accident site said the fuel servos, which activate the fuel valves, operated normally when power was applied to the aircraft’s electrical system and the fuel selectors were manipulated. The electric boost pumps also operated normally. The pilot later sent the following note to the FAA inspector: "I have been trying to figure out why there was no fuel in the fuselage tank, and so much (fuel) in the right wing (tank). I’m not sure I turned the fuel shut off valves to OFF before I turned off the master switch. I guess I was a little shook up. With the right wing lower I believe it could gravity feed." The airplane’s insurance company hired a salvage retriever to recover the airplane and before it could be moved, the fuel had to be drained from the tanks. The retriever reported the left wing contained 17 gallons of fuel, the right wing contained 57 gallons of fuel, the main fuselage tank contained 2.5 gallons of fuel, and the auxiliary fuselage tank contained 28 gallons of fuel. After the accident, Varsol was added to the main fuselage tank and auxiliary fuselage tank. Neither tank leaked. The fuel sumps contain check valves which prevent the back-flow of fuel from one fuel tank to another. Further examination revealed the fuselage contained two fuel filler necks, one for each fuselage tank (main and auxiliary). The auxiliary tank was clearly placarded with the red placard visibly standing out against the silver paint stripe. The main tank is not clearly placarded with the red placard blending easily with the red paint stripe. After takeoff, the right engine experienced a loss of power followed by the left engine losing power. The pilot maneuvered the airplane toward the nearest open field and the airplane impacted terrain during landing, resulting in a circumferential split in fuselage near the aft pressure bulkhead. The airplane was equipped with 4 fuel tanks: 2 located in each wing outboard of the engine nacelle (65-gallon capacity), 1 main fuselage tank (about 44-gallon capacity), and 1 auxiliary tank located in forward section of baggage compartment (45-gallon capacity). The airplane was capable of carrying 209.5 gallons usable fuel and the pilot stated that prior to departure he filled the main fuselage tank to capacity, added 20 gallons in the auxiliary tank and 25 gallons in each wing tank, which he equated to a total of 131 gallons on board. The fuselage contained two fuel filler necks, one for each fuselage tank (main and auxiliary). The auxiliary tank was clearly placarded with a red placard visibly standing out against a silver paint stripe; the main tank was not clearly placarded, with a red placard blending easily with red paint stripe. A salvage retriever recalled that during recovery the left wing contained 17 gallons of fuel, the right wing contained 57 gallons of fuel, the main fuselage tank contained 2.5 gallons of fuel, and the auxiliary fuselage tank contained 28 gallons of fuel. A postaccident examination of the airplane and engines revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The main fuselage tank and auxiliary fuselage tank were not breached and the fuel sumps contained check valves which prevent the back-flow of fuel from one fuel tank to another. Based on the evidence it is likely that the pilot exhausted the airplane's fuel supply in the main fuselage tank, which resulted in the loss of power to both engines. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Fuel-Incorrect service/maintenance - C
- F Aircraft-Aircraft handling/service-Placards and markings-(general)-Not serviced/maintained - F
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_CEN10LA425.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel starvation). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗