CEN10LA560
2010-09-20 · Schaumburg, Illinois, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 06C
Current FAA registration · N34LB
- Make / Model
- HUGHES 269C
- Year of manufacture
- 1978 · 32 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING HIO-360-D1A (190 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 3 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20090401
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A3BBF1
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The in-flight separation of the left aft cluster fitting assembly following the loss of torque on the lock nut due to a manufacturing defect.
Factual narrative
On September 20, 2010, at 1720 central daylight time, a Schweizer 269C single-engine helicopter, N34LB, sustained substantial damage during a forced landing after experiencing a mechanical malfunction while hovering prior to takeoff at the Schaumburg Regional Airport, Schaumburg, Illinois. The helicopter was owned and operated by Bachman Aero, Skokie, Illinois. The certificated flight instructor and pilot receiving instruction were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight. The local flight was originating at the time of the accident. According to the pilot and registered owner, while hovering prior to departure for a routine training flight, a bolt and its associated hardware for the left aft cluster fitting of the tail boom assembly departed the helicopter. The helicopter experienced a vibration and subsequently yawed to the right when the instructor initiated a forced landing. The skids contacted the ground, the helicopter rotated 180 degrees and came to rest upright. Examination of the helicopter revealed the tail boom was partially separated and the tail rotor driveshaft had separated. The bolt and its associated hardware were located on the ramp near the helicopter and were retained for further examination. In addition, the right aft cluster fitting bolt with its associated hardware, which remained attached, were removed and retained for examination. A review of the maintenance records revealed the aft cluster fitting modification kit (Schweizer P/N: SA-269K-0106-1) was installed on the helicopter on June 1, 2010, at a total aircraft time of 1,512.8 hours. On September 10, 2010, 25/50/100/300/400-hour/Annual inspections were performed with no anomalies noted with the aft cluster assembly at a total aircraft time of 1,693.9 hours. The owner stated that since the installation of the aft cluster, the cluster and its components had not been removed or replaced. The airframe had accumulated 1,729.1 total hours at the time of the accident. According to Schweizer Service Letter L-177, AFT CLUSTER FITTING MODIFICATION KIT, dated September 13, 2002, the company developed and approved the cluster modification kit as an alternate means of compliance (AMOC) for the repetitive inspections mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2001-25-52. AD 2001-25-52 mandated a repetitive dye penetrant inspection of the aft cluster fittings used on certain Schweizer helicopters. The letter states, "The installation of this kit is recommended at owner's/operator's convenience to provide enhanced aft cluster fitting durability." On December 9, 2010, at the facilities of IMR Test Labs, Lansing, New York, under the supervision of a NTSB senior air safety investigator, the accident nut and bolt assemblies were examined. In addition, two new bolt and nut assemblies that were supplied by Schweizer were examined for comparison. It was noted that the bolts were Avibank-5 adjustable diameter bolts that were secured with a MS-21043 lock nut torqued to 23-inch pounds (lbs). According to the IMR report, examination of the bolts removed from the accident helicopter showed no anomalies to suggest that they contributed to the loosening. Examination of the lock nut from the loosened left side fastener revealed incomplete threads at the pinch point of the locking stake. Torque testing showed the loosened left side lock nut had no prevailing torque. The prevailing torque should have been between 2 to 18 in-lbs. On December 20, 2010, the FAA issued Emergency AD 2011-01-52, which required before further flight, unless previously accomplished, the removal of the lock nut. The lock nut should then be reinstalled while determining the lock nut drag torque. If the drag torque is a minimum of 2 in-lbs, retorquing the locknut to 23 in-lbs is required. If the drag torque is not at least 2 in-lbs, the replacement of the lock nut with an airworthy lock nut is required. While the helicopter was hovering prior to departure for a routine training flight, a bolt and its associated hardware for the left aft cluster fitting of the tail boom assembly departed the helicopter. Subsequently, the instructor initiated a forced landing and the helicopter came to rest upright. Examination of the bolt and lock nut revealed incomplete threads at the pinch point of the locking stake due to a manufacturing defect. The bolt and lock nut assembly were installed as part of an aft cluster fitting modification that was performed about 4 months and 216 operational hours prior to the accident. As a result of the accident, the Federal Aviation Administration issued an Emergency Airworthiness Directive for owners to check the lock nuts. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft structures-Fuselage-Fuselage attach fittings sys-Failure - C
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-(general)-Attain/maintain not possible
- C Organizational issues-Development-Manufacture/production-(general)-Manufacturer - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_CEN10LA560.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.