CEN11LA043
2010-10-29 · Port Mansfield, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport T05
Current FAA registration · N234PM
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA46-500TP
- Year of manufacture
- 2005 · 5 years old at event
- Engine
- P&W CANADA PT6A-42A (850 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20220110
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A218AD
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The total loss of engine power for undetermined reasons because examination of the airframe and engine did not reveal any anomalies that would have contributed to the loss of engine power.
Factual narrative
On October 29, 2010, about 1611 central daylight time, a Piper Aircraft, Inc. PA-46-500TP, N234PM, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power while departing Charles R. Johnson Airport (T05), Port Mansfield, Texas. The airline transport pilot and two passengers were not injured. The cross country flight was being conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 with an instrument flight rules flight plan. The flight was originating from T05 at the time of the accident, with Alfred C. Thomas Airport (T69), Sinton, Texas, as the intended destination. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The pilot stated preflight and run up for takeoff were uneventful. The takeoff roll and departure were normal through gear retraction. Following gear retraction, at about 125 knots, the engine lost power for about 2 seconds. The engine regained power for 3 to 4 seconds and then "lost power again." The pilot flew under power lines and performed a forced landing in a semi open field. During landing the left wing impacted a tree and spun the airplane about 180 degrees, substantially damaging the airplane. Two postaccident examinations of the wreckage occurred. One took place at the scene of the accident on November 1, 2010, under the supervision of a Federal Aviation Administration inspector. The second took place at a secure storage facility on November 9, 2010, under the supervision of a NTSB investigator. Fuel was noted in the low pressure fuel bowl and the main fuel sump bowl. The fuel appeared clear and free of contaminants. No anomalies were noted with the airframe during either of these inspections. The engine data acquisition unit (DAU) was removed and sent to the NTSB vehicles recorder laboratory for download, and the engine with attached accessories were removed from the airframe and sent to the manufacturer’s facility for examination. The engine was disassembled and examined under the supervision of a Canadian Transportation Safety Board (TSB) investigator on February 17 and 18, 2011. The engine displayed impact damage, deformation of the exhaust duct, and locally at the gas generator case. The 1st and 2nd stage power turbine guide vane rings displayed circumferential rubbing as a result of making contact with their adjacent components under impact loads. Nothing was noted during the disassembly of the engine that would have precluded normal operation. The fuel control unit (FCU) was examined externally and tested for operation on a flow bench. The unit met all requirements of a normal Bendix acceptance test with only minor variances attributable to adjustments made during engine set up following installation in the airplane. The fuel control pump was tested separately from the FCU and found to be within normal acceptable limits in both the normal and bypass modes and the inlet screen and outlet filters were both clear of debris or obstructions. The torque limiter, compressor bleed valves, dump and starting solenoid valve, fuel nozzle set, and the fuel oil heater thermovalve all tested within manufacturer’s specifications. The Woodward propeller over-speed governor was tested at an independent facility under the supervision of the NTSB investigator in charge and no anomalies were noted that could have contributed to the accident. The DAU was downloaded and both channels of the DAU recorded engine condition trend monitoring (ECTM) data events; however, no ECTM events were recorded on the day of the accident. The pilot reported that shortly after takeoff the engine lost power momentarily, just before losing power completely. The pilot performed an emergency landing in a nearby field. The airplane sustained substantial damage during the forced landing. The airframe, engine, and engine accessories were examined. Fuel was noted at the engine, and no anomalies were revealed that would have contributed to the accident. The cause of the loss of power could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (turbine/turboprop)-(general)-Failure - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_CEN11LA043.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…