CEN11LA169
2011-01-30 · Chesapeake, Ohio, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport HTW
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The partial loss of engine power due to carburetor icing and the pilot’s delayed use of carburetor heat and failure to attain the proper touchdown point on the runway during the precautionary landing.
Factual narrative
On January 30, 2011, about 1350 eastern standard time, a Cessna 172P, N55212, sustained substantial damage when it impacted the terrain after it hit trees during an aborted landing from runway 26 (3001 feet by 70 feet, asphalt) at the Lawrence County Airport (HTW), South Point, Ohio. The private pilot and passenger received minor injuries. The airplane was registered to and operated by Attitude Aviation under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The flight departed HTW at 1335 en route to Logan, West Virginia. In an interview with inspectors from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the pilot reported that when he arrived at the airport, he noted that the accident airplane had just returned from a flight. He conducted a preflight inspection of the rental airplane and noted that there were about 12 gallons of fuel in the right tank and 11 gallons in the left tank. He sumped the fuel tanks and found the fuel free of contaminants. After engine start, he taxied to the ramp’s run-up area and conducted the engine run-up. He checked the magnetos and carburetor heat and found no anomalies. After completing his run-up, he back taxied on runway 8 into position for takeoff. After a final inspection of engine instruments and flight instruments/controls, he proceeded to apply full throttle for the takeoff run. He stated that the takeoff was normal. He continued to climb on the runway heading and noted that he had cleared the high terrain that lies just north of the airport. The pilot reported that the engine suddenly and continuously started to sound as if it was running “rough” and “missing”. He stated he did not check engine instruments, keeping his focus outside. He immediately executed a steep left turn to return and land. Upon completing the turn, he realized he was too high for his intended landing on runway 26. He retarded the throttle to idle, extended full flaps, executed a forward slip, and began a series of shallow S-turns to lose altitude. He did not remember if he applied carburetor heat, although that was his normal practice. On the final approach for runway 26, he knew he was too high and “slightly” fast. He stated that the airspeed was 70-75 knots as the airplane crossed the threshold and began to “float” down the runway. The airplane touched down about 2,000 feet down the runway, and he applied the toe brakes without effect. He stated his focus was on the tree line at the end of the runway. He stated as the aircraft approached the tree line, he realized he was going to hit the trees. He applied full power and attempted to retract the flaps “one notch” to avoid hitting the trees low, still not intending to go-around with a “faulty” engine. He stated that the flaps came “all the way up” as he raised the nose to avoid hitting the trees. He reported that the airspeed indicator read 60 knots as the stall horn sounded and the airplane impacted the tree tops. The left wing dropped and the airplane rotated to the left with the nose impacting the ground. The airplane came to rest in an upright position facing the runway. The pilot and passenger evacuated the airplane out the passenger’s door. FAA inspectors examined the airplane at the accident site. It was substantially damaged, but generally in one piece. The first impact scar and matching paint chips indicated that the left wingtip made first contact with the ground. The wing and fuselage were substantially damaged. One propeller blade exhibited tip curl. The other blade was bent forward, but the leading edge exhibited nicks and gouges. Inspection of the instrument panel indicated that the carburetor heat was on, the throttle was full open, and the flaps were set at 0 degrees. First responders reported that they had moved the fuel selector/mixture to the OFF position. The engine oil level was found to be at 5.25 quarts and both wing fuel tanks were found to be approximately 3/4 full. Fuel sumped from wing tanks and lower sump was found to be clean and free of contaminants. An engine continuity field test was performed and no anomalies were noted. Spark plugs, filters, fuel lines, magnetos, carburetor, and engine compression were all found to be satisfactory. The inspection of the aircraft logbook entries and all required documentation revealed no discrepancies. The student pilot, who had flown the accident airplane prior to the accident flight, reported that he did not experience any engine problems or icing conditions during his 0.6 hour flight. At 1351, the reported surface weather observation at (HTS) located 5 nautical miles southwest of HTW was: wind 040 degrees at 7 knots, 10 miles visibility, sky clear, temperature 7 degrees Celsius (C), dew point 1 degree C, altimeter 30.10. The Carburetor Icing Chart indicates that “Serious Icing – Any Power” exists with a temperature of 7 degrees C and a dew point of 1 degrees C. The pilot reported that the takeoff run was normal, but during the initial climb the engine started to sound as if it was running rough. He immediately executed a steep left turn to return and land on the runway. On the final approach the airplane was high and fast, and floated down the runway. The airplane touched down about 2,000 feet down the runway and the pilot applied the toe brakes without effect. He applied full power and attempted to retract the flaps to avoid hitting the trees that were beyond the departure end of the runway. With the airspeed about 60 knots, the stall horn sounded and the airplane impacted the tree tops. The left wing dropped and the airplane rotated to the left with the nose impacting the ground. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no airframe or engine anomalies. Based on the temperature and dew point about the time of the accident, the conditions were favorable for serious icing at any power setting. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Temp/humidity/pressure-Conducive to carburetor icing-Contributed to outcome - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_CEN11LA169.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall, go-around). All research papers
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR) An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Publication (TP) NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program: Flight Test Report
This report presents results from research flights that explored the characteristics of an ice-contaminated tailplane using various simulated ice shapes attached to the leading edge of the horizontal …
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Other [Tail Plane Icing]
The Aviation Safety Program initiated by NASA in 1997 has put greater emphasis in safety related research activities. Ice-contaminated-tailplane stall (ICTS) has been identified by the NASA Lewis Icin…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA) Airport Policing in Pakistan: Structure, Training, and Issue
Airports are strategically and economically important installations of any country. Airports are the gateway of any country and any incidents at these gateways may harm the very aspects of a country i…