CEN12LA181
2012-03-05 · Staples, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to attain the proper descent rate during autorotation, which resulted in a hard landing. Contributing to the accident were the inflight vibrations and loss of torque pedal response for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On March 5, 2012, about 1136 central standard time, a Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation 269C helicopter, N1099N, impacted terrain during a precautionary landing following an in-flight pop sound and torque pedal vibrations near Staples, Texas. The private pilot and passenger reported no injuries. The helicopter sustained substantial tailboom damage. The helicopter was registered to and operated by Xotic Aviation LLC. under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as personal flight. Day visual flight rules (VFR) conditions prevailed for the flight, which did not operated on a VFR flight plan. The flight originated from Fentress Airpark, near Fentress, Texas, about 1121, and was destined for Bulverde Airpark, near San Antonio, Texas. According to the pilot's accident report, about 15 minutes into the flight, he heard a "pop" sound "like metal breaking." He felt a violent vibration and loss of torque pedal response. The pilot reported that there was no change in "RPM" and he performed a precautionary landing due to the vibration. The helicopter impacted terrain hard and the main rotor blades impacted the tailboom. The engine was shut down by the pilot after the landing. The pilot held a private pilot certificate with ratings for rotorcraft-helicopter. His last Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) second-class medical was issued on August 24, 2011, with no limitations. The pilot reported that he had accumulated 143 hours of total flight time, of which 100 hours were in same make and model as the accident helicopter. He indicated flying 21 hours in the last 90 days and 10 hours in the last 30 days. FAA inspectors and a manufacturer's safety investigator examined the helicopter. The helicopter wreckage debris field was approximately 100 yards long. The cockpit mounted Hobbs meter indicated 479.9 hours. The cockpit flight controls exhibited continuity. The tailboom was partially separated at its middle section just forward of the center attach fitting. The left tailboom support strut tube was separated at the tailboom end through the bolt holes attaching the tube to its end fitting. Tail rotor controls exhibited continuity up to the separated points of the tailboom and its rod ends safety wired hardware was intact. Drive system rotation was confirmed at the lower pulley shaft, the overrunning clutch, and up to the separated end of the tail rotor drive shaft. A main rotor damper assembly with blade grip attachment bracket and its hardware was retained for further examination. Maintenance records showed that the helicopter's total time at its last maintenance work on February 8, 2012, was 10,037.2 hours and its Hobbs meter indicated 460.2 hours. The last maintenance in the logbook was the installation of a repaired main rotor blade. The last annual inspection was performed on January 24, 2012. A National Transportation Safety Board senior materials engineer examined the retained damper items. A manufacturer's periodic extension-under-load test was applied to the damper and the damper met the test's specifications. Separation surfaces present on the damper assembly were consistent with overload and no evidence of preexisting cracks were observed. No anomalies were detected that would have precluded normal operations. The reason for the pop and subsequent vibration was not determined. About 15 minutes into a cross-country flight, the pilot heard a "pop" that sounded "like metal breaking." He felt a violent vibration and loss of torque pedal response. The pilot reported that there was no change in rpm, and he performed a precautionary autorotation and landing due to the vibration. During the landing, the helicopter impacted the ground hard and the main rotor blades contacted the tailboom. On-scene and subsequent laboratory examination revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The reason for the pop and subsequent vibration could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Descent rate-Not attained/maintained - C
- F Aircraft-Aircraft propeller/rotor-Tail rotor drive system-(general)-Malfunction - F
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2012_CEN12LA181.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.