CEN12LA189
2012-03-18 · Arcola, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport KAXH
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot did not maintain adequate crosswind correction during the landing flare and the flight instructor's delayed remedial action.
Factual narrative
On March 18, 2012, at 1738 central daylight time, a Piper PA-28R-200 airplane, N56273, was substantially damaged while landing at Houston Southwest Airport (KAXH), Arcola, Texas. The flight instructor and pilot-receiving-instruction were not injured. The airplane was registered to and operated by Dutch Wings, LLC, under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 while on an instrument flight plan. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the instructional flight that departed KAXH at 1500. The pilot-receiving-instruction reported that an application of full left rudder along with right aileron input was required to maintain alignment with the runway centerline during final approach to runway 9 (5,003 feet by 100 feet, asphalt). He stated that as the airplane crossed over the touchdown zone he reduced engine power and flared for touchdown. During the landing flare, the airplane encountered a wind gust and drifted off the left edge of the runway. He stated that his flight instructor assumed control of the airplane and attempted a go-around, but the airplane was unable to climb and subsequently landed in a ditch before sliding into a nearby hangar. The flight instructor reported that the airplane encountered a wind gust during the landing flare and began to drift left of the runway centerline. He noted that he assumed control of the airplane as it drifted off the left side of the runway. He stated that he advanced engine power for a go-around, but the airplane had insufficient airspeed to establish a climb. He further noted that the pilot-receiving-instruction did not relinquish his left rudder input, and in combination with the left-turning tendency experienced at takeoff power he was unable to reestablish directional control before the airplane impacted a ditch. The fuselage and wings were substantially damaged during the accident sequence. The flight instructor reported that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane. At 1735, the airport's automated surface observing system reported the following weather conditions: wind 130 degrees at 11 knots, gusting 15 knots; visibility 10 miles; temperature 23 degrees Celsius; dew point 20 degrees Celsius; altimeter setting 29.98 inches of mercury. The sky condition was not reported. The pilot-receiving-instruction was attempting to land the airplane in a right quartering crosswind, which was gusting to 15 knots. The pilot reported that an application of full left rudder along with right aileron input was required to maintain alignment with the runway centerline. During the landing flare, the airplane encountered a wind gust and drifted off the left side of the runway. He stated that his flight instructor assumed control of the airplane and attempted a go-around, but the airplane was unable to climb and subsequently landed in a ditch. The flight instructor reported that he assumed control of the airplane as it drifted off the runway, and the airplane had insufficient airspeed to establish a climb. He further noted that the pilot did not relinquish his left rudder input, and, because of this, in combination with the left-turning tendency experienced at takeoff power, he was unable to reestablish directional control before the airplane impacted a ditch. The flight instructor reported that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Crosswind correction-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Delayed action-Instructor/check pilot - C
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Wind-Gusts-Response/compensation
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Wind-Crosswind-Response/compensation
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2012_CEN12LA189.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…