CEN14TA116
2014-01-16 · Spring, Texas, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport DWH
Current FAA registration · N250TX
- Make / Model
- AUTO GYRO GMBH MTOSPORT
- Engine
- ROTAX 912ULS SERIES (100 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20140821
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A2593D
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s failure to maintain the gyroplane’s rotor control during the landing roll in gusting crosswind conditions.
Factual narrative
On January 16, 2014, about 1140 central standard time, an AutoGyro MTOsport gyroplane, N250TX, sustained substantial damage during landing roll when it veered off the runway and rolled over after its main rotor struck the runway at the David Wayne Hooks Memorial Airport (DWH), Spring, Texas. The pilot and one passenger received minor injuries. The gyroplane was registered to and operated by the City of Tomball, Texas, as a public use aircraft. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident, and no flight plan was filed. The gyroplane departed DWH at 1030 on a local flight. The pilot stated that the control tower reported the wind was 210 degrees at 11 knots gusting to 19 knots as he attempted to land on runway 17L (3,987 feet by 35 feet, asphalt). He performed a go-around due to the wind gusts blowing the gyrocopter off course, and he was cleared to land on runway 17R (7,009 feet by 100 feet, asphalt). The pilot reported a quartering crosswind as he flew the approach to 17R; however, he landed the gyroplane without incident. He reported that as he was reaching forward to change the pneumatic mode selector button from "Flight" to "Brake," a strong gust of wind from the west lifted the gyrocopter. The right wheel came off the ground allowing the main rotor blade to strike the runway surface. The pilot attempted to straighten the gyroplane, but it veered off the runway and rolled onto its right side, resulting in substantial damage to the empennage and main rotor. The pilot reported no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the gyroplane that would have precluded normal operation. The flight manual for the gyroplane state that the maximum crosswind component for take-off and landings is 20 knots. The maximum tailwind component for take-off and landing is 5 knots. The maximum wind speed or gust intensity is 40 knots. The calculated crosswind component during the landing was about 10 knots. The flight manual for the gyroplane lists the following "After Landing" procedures: 1. Control stick full forward to level-off rotor disc, at latest when rotor speed leaves green arc! Be prepared for reduced rotor drag! 2. Use lateral control into wind to maintain rotor disc in level attitude. Adjust lateral control input as rotor speed decays. 3. Bring pneumatic mode selector to BRAKE position and return to wheel brake with left hand. 4. Apply rotor brake pressure by using AFT TRIM. Monitor pressure gauge. 5. Taxi carefully, preferably not above walking speed and mind high center of gravity when taking turns. 6. Do not vacate gyroplane until engine and rotor is at a complete stop. The pilot stated that, as he approached the runway, the tower controller reported that the wind was 210 degrees at 11 knots, gusting to 19 knots. He performed a go-around due to the wind gusts blowing the gyroplane off course. He was then cleared to land on the parallel runway. The pilot reported that a quartering crosswind existed as he flew the approach; however, he landed the gyroplane without incident. As the pilot was reaching forward to change the pneumatic mode selector button from the "flight" to the "brake" position, a strong westerly wind gust lifted the gyroplane. The right wheel came off the ground, which caused the main rotor blade to strike the runway. The pilot attempted to straighten the gyroplane, but it veered off the runway and rolled onto its right side, which resulted in substantial damage to the empennage and main rotor. The pilot reported no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the gyroplane that would have precluded normal operation. The calculated crosswind component of 10 knots was below the allowable maximum landing crosswind component of 20 knots. The gyroplane's flight manual states that, after landing, "use lateral control into wind to maintain rotor disc in level flight. Adjust lateral control input as rotor speed decays" before changing the pneumatic mode selector to the "brake" position. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Pilot - C
- — Aircraft-Aircraft propeller/rotor-Main rotor system-Main rotor blade system-Not specified
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Wind-Crosswind-Contributed to outcome
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Wind-Gusts-Contributed to outcome
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-(general)-Not attained/maintained - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_CEN14TA116.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…