NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN15LA224
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot and flight instructor's inadvertent encounter with settling with power during a confined area takeoff at an altitude that was too low for recovery.
Factual narrative
On May 6, 2015 at 1426 central daylight time, an Enstrom F-28F, N8011Q, impacted trees while maneuvering over a field near Argyle, Texas. The helicopter sustained substantial damage. The private pilot and flight instructor sustained serious injuries. The helicopter was registered to US Aviation Group LLC and operated by Longhorn Helicopters under Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as an instructional flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed the time of the accident. The local flight originated from DTO about 1330. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector from the North Texas Flight Standards District Office, the pilot stated he and the flight instructor had flown for approximately 30 minutes prior to the accident. The pilot stated that the helicopter engine seemed to be functioning normally, and he did not recall any unusual power fluctuations or noises. The pilot and flight instructor were practicing confined area takeoffs and had accomplished two confined area takeoffs just preceding the accident with no abnormal issues. During the third confined area takeoff, the helicopter developed power up to 32 inches of manifold pressure and they began the vertical climb to just above tree top level. At that time he stated that they began transition to forward motion and the helicopter began to "settle with power". The pilot stated that as the helicopter began to descend, the flight instructor announced that she "had the controls" and began to attempt increasing power and immediately turned the aircraft around intending to return to the departure point, away from the trees. The helicopter continued to descend and impacted the trees in a slight nose down attitude. According to the FAA inspector, on-scene examination of the helicopter revealed that it made contact with a group of trees, approximately 10 feet from the pasture in which the confined area takeoff maneuver was initiated. The trees were estimated to be 30 feet in height. Debris was confined to the location in which the aircraft impacted. Fire/rescue personnel removed approximately 30 gallons of fuel from the helicopter, which had a fuel capacity of 40 gallons. The right side of the cockpit impacted a tree which penetrated up to the right side collective. The bottom of the cockpit area on both sides near the rudder pedals sustained major damage from impact with the ground. The tail boom and engine area sustained minor damage due to impact with trees and the helicopter remained intact although it was resting in approximately a 30 degree angle with the tail boom suspended in a tree to the rear of the crash site. The main rotors were in a high pitch setting and intact. One main rotor had substantial damage from impact with a tree the other two main rotors did have some bending suggesting a largely vertical descent. The flight instructor stated that she believed that the engine turbocharger waste gate malfunctioned, which prevented them from receiving the extra power required. No mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal aircraft operation were noted during the examination. The required National Transportation Safety Board Pilot/Operator Accident/Incident Report, form 6120, was not received from the private pilot. According to the pilot receiving instruction, he and the flight instructor were performing the third in a series of confined area takeoffs in the helicopter. The previous two takeoffs were conducted with no anomalies observed. The pilot stated that, on the third takeoff, he performed a vertical climb to just above treetop level. As the helicopter transitioned to forward motion, it began to settle, and the flight instructor assumed the flight controls to attempt to return to the departure point. The helicopter continued to descend and subsequently impacted trees and terrain. Postaccident examination of the helicopter revealed no mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Climb rate-Attain/maintain not possible - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Altitude-Not specified - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2015_CEN15LA224.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…
- NASA NTRS 2024 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – Oct 2024
This presentation provides a status update on select NASA icing research activities for the SAE AC-9C Icing Technical Committee Meeting on Oct 21, 2024.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗