CEN16FA212
2016-06-09 · Wishek, North Dakota, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 6L5
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed during a climbing turn after takeoff, which resulted in the airplane exceeding its critical angle of attack and an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's self-induced pressure to quickly transport his cousin for urgent dental care.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn June 9, 2016, about 1521 central daylight time, a Piper PA-28-140 airplane, N6223W, impacted a lake while departing from Wishek Municipal Airport (6L5), Wishek, North Dakota. The pilot and two passengers were fatally injured, and the airplane was substantially damaged. The airplane was registered to the Cherokee Flying Club and operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. Day visual meteorological conditions existed at the time of the accident. The personal flight departed without a flight plan and was destined for Bismarck Municipal Airport (BIS), Bismarck, North Dakota. According to the pilot's parents, the pilot was flying his aunt and cousin to Bismarck so that his cousin could receive urgent dental care. The pilot was a member of the flying club that owned the airplane. Another member of the club, who spoke with the pilot about 10 minutes before the airplane's departure, reported that he thought that the pilot and passengers were rushing as they prepared to leave. A witness located on the airport ramp saw the airplane depart on runway 14 and climb out with a nose-high attitude. According to the witness, after entering a right turn, the airplane rapidly pitched down to a nose-low attitude. Downloaded data from a portable GPS navigation device found in the airplane revealed that the airplane made a right turn after takeoff at 160 ft above ground level and 48 knots groundspeed. The right turn continued for the next 20 seconds during which time the airplane climbed about 30 ft and its groundspeed was between 53 and 59 knots. During the next 8 seconds, the airplane rapidly descended about 200 ft and impacted a lake about 1/2 mile southwest of the airport. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe pilot, age 20, held a private pilot certificate with an airplane single-engine land rating, which was issued on November 9, 2015. On July 22, 2015, the pilot was issued a third class medical certificate with no restrictions. According to an insurance application dated January 12, 2016, the pilot had accumulated 55 total flight hours of which 17 hours were in the accident airplane. The flying club member who spoke with the pilot before the flight stated that the pilot had flown the airplane a few times since returning from college in mid-May, including a flight on the evening before the accident. The pilot's logbook was not available for review. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe airplane was manufactured in 1964 and was equipped with a Lycoming O-320-E3D engine and a Sensenich two-blade, all-metal propeller. On April 1, 2016, the airplane underwent an annual inspection at an airframe total time of 3,459 hours and 1,235 hours since the engine had last been overhauled. The accident occurred about 21 hours after this inspection. The airplane was equipped with a red stall warning light on the instrument panel but was not equipped with a stall warning horn. The flaps-retracted stall speeds listed in the airplane's flight manual were 64 mph (calibrated airspeed) at 0° of bank and 73 mph (calibrated airspeed) at 40° of bank, which equates to 56 knots at 0° of bank and 64 knots at 40° of bank. These stall speeds were based on a maximum gross weight of 2,150 pounds. At the time of the accident, the airplane's weight was estimated to be about 300 pounds less than maximum gross weight. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONAt 1552, the weather observation station at BIS, located about 60 miles northwest of the accident site, reported the following conditions: wind 160° at 6 knots, 10 miles visibility, clear skies, temperature 33°C, dew point 15°C, and altimeter setting 29.67 inches of mercury. AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe airplane was manufactured in 1964 and was equipped with a Lycoming O-320-E3D engine and a Sensenich two-blade, all-metal propeller. On April 1, 2016, the airplane underwent an annual inspection at an airframe total time of 3,459 hours and 1,235 hours since the engine had last been overhauled. The accident occurred about 21 hours after this inspection. The airplane was equipped with a red stall warning light on the instrument panel but was not equipped with a stall warning horn. The flaps-retracted stall speeds listed in the airplane's flight manual were 64 mph (calibrated airspeed) at 0° of bank and 73 mph (calibrated airspeed) at 40° of bank, which equates to 56 knots at 0° of bank and 64 knots at 40° of bank. These stall speeds were based on a maximum gross weight of 2,150 pounds. At the time of the accident, the airplane's weight was estimated to be about 300 pounds less than maximum gross weight. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONExamination of the airplane at the accident site revealed that the airplane came to rest in a nose-down attitude in about 4 ft of water. The damage to the airplane was consistent with a near-vertical descent with a low forward velocity at impact. Following recovery from the lake, the airplane and engine were examined in a nearby hangar. Both wings were intact and remained attached to the fuselage by the main wing spars. The main landing gear assemblies were attached to their respective wings, and both wing flaps were retracted. The flight control surfaces remained attached to their respective airframe surfaces. No anomalies were noted with the flight control system. Stabilator and aileron control continuity were established from the respective controls to the "T" bar chain. Stabilator trim continuity was established from the trim tab to the trim crank handle in the overhead panel, and the stabilator trim barrel indicated a neutral trim setting. Rudder control continuity was established from the rudder to the rudder pedal assembly. Both fuel tank caps were installed, and both fuel tank vents were found clear of debris. The fuel selector valve was in the right-wing fuel tank position. A functional check of the fuel selector valve, using low pressure air, revealed that the valve was functional. The fuel pump operated normally when hand rotated, and the carburetor was disassembled and no anomalies were noted. The propeller remained attached to the engine, and the spinner was attached to the spinner bulkhead and crushed aft. The propeller blades were minimally damaged with one blade having minor abrasions on the leading edge of its tip. The top Champion REM40E sparkplugs were removed from the cylinders. All displayed a normal worn condition when compared to the Champion Aviation Service Manual (AV6-R). After cleaning with compressed air and contact cleaner, both magnetos sparked normally at all leads during rotation. The four cylinders remained attached to the crankcase. The rocker covers were removed, and no preaccident anomalies were noted with the rockers, rocker shafts, or valve springs. A borescope inspection of the four cylinders revealed no anomalies with the pistons, cylinder barrels, cylinder heads, valves, or valve seats. The engine exhaust system was found impact damaged; however, the heat muff was intact with no significant cracks or exhaust erosion. Examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATIONOn June 10, 2016, the North Dakota Department of Health medical examiner in Bismarck, North Dakota performed an autopsy on the pilot. The cause of death was blunt force injuries with drowning. The FAA's Civil Aeromedical Institute in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma performed toxicology tests on the pilot. The results were negative for all tests conducted. TESTS AND RESEARCHThe portable GPS navigation device found in the airplane, a Garmin Aera 560, was recovered from the accident site and evaluated by the NTSB Recorder Laboratory. For further details, see the GPS Factual Report in the public docket for this investigation. The private pilot was flying his aunt and cousin to a location where his cousin could receive urgent dental care. The pilot was a member of the flying club that owned the airplane, and another member of the flying club reported that he thought that the pilot and his passengers were rushing as they prepared to leave. A witness located on the airport ramp saw the airplane take off, climb with a nose-high attitude, turn right, and rapidly pitch down to a nose-low attitude. The airplane was found in a lake 1/2 mile from the airport. Downloaded data from an onboard GPS navigation device were consistent with the observations of the witness and indicated that the airplane began to turn right at 160 ft above ground level with a groundspeed of 48 knots. The right turn continued for 20 seconds during which time the airplane climbed about 40 ft and its groundspeed ranged from 53 to 59 knots. The airplane then rapidly descended into the lake. The damage to the airplane indicated that it impacted the lake in a near-vertical, nose-down attitude with low forward velocity. Examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The GPS data, the witness report, and the damage to the airplane were consistent with the pilot failing to maintain sufficient airspeed during a climbing turn after takeoff, which resulted in the airplane's wing exceeding its critical angle of attack and an aerodynamic stall. The purpose of the flight was for an urgent medical issue. The pilot's rushed activities before flight, and his actions immediately after takeoff to enter a climbing turn at low altitude without ensuring sufficient airspeed, are consistent with the effects of self-induced pressure. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-(general)-Not attained/maintained - C
- F Personnel issues-Psychological-Personality/attitude-Motivation/respond to pressure-Pilot - F
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2016_CEN16FA212.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…