CEN16LA221
2016-06-15 · Sealy, Texas, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 1XA7
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Failure of maintenance personnel to comply with the engine manufacturer’s mandatory service bulletin, which resulted in failure of the mechanical fuel pump diaphragm and a subsequent total loss of engine power.
Factual narrative
On June 15, 2016, about 1430 central daylight time, a Flight Design GMBH CTSW HXB, N302CT, collided with trees during a forced landing at Gloster Aerodrome (1XA7), Houston, Texas. The student pilot and flight instructor both sustained minor injuries. The airplane was destroyed. The airplane was registered to and operated by the student pilot under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as an instructional flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident, and no flight plan had been filed. The local flight had just originated.According to the flight instructor, the student pilot made the takeoff on runway 25. During the initial climb (about 500 feet AGL), the engine started running rough and lost all power. The instructor took control of the airplane and made a 180-degree turn back towards the airport. A forced landing to runway 07 was attempted but due to a strong tailwind, the airplane collided with trees to the right of the runway. On October 20, under the auspices of a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, the engine was examined at the facilities of South Mississippi Light Aircraft in Lucedale, Mississippi. A Rotax engine representative was also in attendance. Reportedly, the engine would not start on the first attempt. It was determined that the engine was not receiving fuel due to a leak in the fuel pump diaphragm. When an electric fuel pump on the engine test stand was turned on, fuel poured out of the fuel pump drain hole. Disassembly of the fuel pump confirmed that the rubber diaphragm had deteriorated and was leaking. When a serviceable fuel pump was installed, the engine operated normally and produced full power. No further anomalies were noted. According to the engine logbook, Rotax Service Bulletin SB-912-053-UL (Replacement of fuel pump for Rotax Engine Type 912), dated April 13, 2007, had been complied with on May 24, 2006 (see page 5 of manual). However, Rotax Service Bulletin SB-912-063-UL (Replacement for fuel pumps for Rotax Engine Type 912), dated August 21, 2013, had not been performed. The fuel pump that was installed on the engine (part number 892 542, serial number 07.002314) was manufactured in 2009 and was affected by this service bulletin but it was not listed in the log book. The fuel pump was also affected by Bombardier's Recreational Products Maintenance Manual, requiring a mandatory replacement time of 5 years. Following the recommended replacement date of May 24, 2012, annual inspections of the engine were conducted on November 12, 2012, May 2, 2014, and June 6, 2016. A conditional engine examination was performed on June 13, 2015. During the initial climb on an instructional flight, the light sport airplane experienced a total loss of engine power. The flight instructor initiated a 180-degree turn back toward the airport; however, the airplane impacted trees to the right of the runway. Postaccident examination revealed that the mechanical fuel pump diaphragm had deteriorated and was leaking fuel. A serviceable fuel pump was installed, and the engine operated normally and produced full power during a subsequent test run. The fuel pump was subject to a mandatory service bulletin (SB) issued by the manufacturer about 3 years before the accident. The SB required replacement of the fuel pump at the next scheduled maintenance due to instances of mechanical failure. Although the accident airplane had received three annual inspections between the issuance of the SB and the accident flight, the fuel pump was not replaced at any of these inspections. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Fuel system-Fuel pumps-Failure - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Fuel system-Fuel pumps-Incorrect service/maintenance - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Lack of action-Maintenance personnel - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Lack of action-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2016_CEN16LA221.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.