NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN18LA362
Registry · N2305K
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
LUSCOMBE 8E
Engine
CONT MOTOR C85 SERIES (85 hp)
Seats / Engines
2 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19561108
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A20B91
Registrant of record
SCIMONE MICHAEL J
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power shortly after takeoff due to carburetor ice.
Factual narrative
On August 31, 2018, about 1400 eastern daylight time, a Luscombe 8E airplane, N2305K, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near New Carlisle, Ohio. The pilot sustained serious injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that his preflight inspection did not reveal any anomalies with the airplane. He visually confirmed that the right wing fuel tank was full and the left fuel tank was about 1/2 full. After starting the engine, he taxied the airplane to the runway and completed an engine runup, which revealed no anomalies. The pilot reported that he verified the proper function of the carburetor heat control and that he did not observe any indication of carburetor ice. The pilot initiated takeoff and the airplane became airborne about one-half to two-thirds down the 2,000-ft-long runway. The pilot reported that airplane had reduced climb performance after liftoff and that the engine began running rough about 150 ft above the ground. The pilot turned the carburetor heat on, but then removed it when he perceived an increase in engine roughness. The engine subsequently lost total power. The pilot entered a right turn toward a nearby nursery, where he completed a forced landing. The airplane landed hard on uneven terrain and the main landing gear collapsed. The airplane came to rest about 1/2 mile west-northwest of the departure end of runway 27. The forward fuselage and the right wing sustained substantial damage during the hard landing. Flight control continuity was confirmed from the cockpit controls to all flight control surfaces. First responders reported a strong fuel smell and observed fuel leaking from the engine compartment, and a mechanic from the airport subsequently turned off the right fuel tank valve to stop the fuel leak. The left fuel tank valve was found turned off. The right and left fuel tanks contained about 5 gallons and 6.75 gallons of fuel, respectively. Samples from the fuel tanks were blue in color, had the odor of 100 low-lead aviation fuel, and exhibited minor particulate contamination. Examination of the vented fuel tank caps did not reveal any anomalies or obstructions. The fuel gascolator bowl shattered during impact. The engine remained attached to the firewall through its mounts, but the carburetor separated from the engine crankcase. Engine control continuity was confirmed from the cockpit to the carburetor. Movement of the throttle arm discharged fuel from the accelerator pump into the carburetor venturi. The carburetor bowl remained intact and contained uncontaminated fuel. The carburetor heat valve position could not be determined due to impact damage. Internal engine and valve train continuity were confirmed as the engine crankshaft was rotated, and compression and suction were noted on all cylinders in conjunction with crankshaft rotation. Compression measurements were above 70 psi for all four cylinders. A borescope inspection of each cylinder did not reveal any evidence of a mechanical failure of the pistons or valves. The spark plugs exhibited features consistent with normal engine operation. Both magnetos produced spark as the engine crankshaft was rotated. The propeller remained attached to the engine crankshaft flange; one propeller blade was bent aft about midspan, and the other blade remained straight with no evidence of rotational damage. Examination of the airplane and engine did not reveal any evidence of mechanical malfunction that would have precluded normal operation. According to a carburetor icing probability chart contained in FAA Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin CE-09-35, entitled "Carburetor Icing Prevention", the recorded temperature and dew point about the time of the accident were conducive to the formation of carburetor icing at a descent engine power setting. The bulletin notes that if ice forms in the carburetor of a fixed-pitch propeller aircraft, the restriction to the induction airflow will result in decreased power output and a drop in engine rpm, which might be accompanied or followed by a rough running engine. The bulletin also notes that a pilot should respond to carburetor icing by applying full carburetor heat immediately and that the engine may run rough initially for a short time while the ice melts. The pilot reported that the airplane exhibited reduced climb performance during takeoff and that the engine began running rough when the airplane had climbed to about 150 ft above the ground. The pilot turned on the carburetor heat, but then removed carburetor heat when he perceived an increase in engine roughness. The engine subsequently lost total power and the pilot performed a forced landing, resulting in substantial damage to the forward fuselage and right wing. Examination of the airplane and engine did not reveal any evidence of mechanical malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation. Both fuel tanks contained fuel, the vented fuel caps were not obstructed, and there was uncontaminated fuel found in the carburetor fuel bowl. The weather conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to the formation of carburetor icing at a descent engine power setting. Although the pilot did not observe any evidence of carburetor ice when he verified function of the carburetor heat control before takeoff, given the lack of engine anomalies, the pilot's description of reduced climb performance and the rough-running engine was consistent with the accumulation of carburetor ice. The reported increase in engine roughness after carburetor heat was applied is further evidence of carburetor ice, but the pilot’s momentary application of carburetor heat would have been ineffective in removing the ice and restoring engine power. Additionally, the low altitude at which the loss of engine power occurred significantly reduced the amount of time available to the pilot to troubleshoot and restore engine power before the forced landing. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Temp/humidity/pressure-Conducive to carburetor icing-Effect on equipment
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2018_CEN18LA362.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER)
A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint
An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…
- NASA NTRS 2024 · Presentation
NASA Icing Update – Oct 2024
This presentation provides a status update on select NASA icing research activities for the SAE AC-9C Icing Technical Committee Meeting on Oct 21, 2024.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗