CEN21LA388
2021-08-03 · Iron Mountain, Michigan, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport IMT
Current FAA registration · N6778A
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 172
- Year of manufacture
- 1956 · 65 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR 0-300 SER (145 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19560611
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A8F92A
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The mechanics’ failure to follow procedures for high-thrust operations at the nontowered airport, which resulted in jet blast damage to an airplane taxiing nearby.
Factual narrative
On August 3, 2021, about 1130 central daylight time, a Cessna 172, N6778A, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident at Ford Airport (IMT), Iron Mountain, Michigan. The pilot and passenger suffered minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported he landed at IMT, a nontowered airport, and taxied toward parking. As the pilot passed about 200 ft behind a parked Bombardier CRJ-200, he noted that cones were placed around the CRJ-200 and the airplane’s beacon was rotating, but no marshal or spotter was on the ramp. Two mechanics were conducting a maintenance test on the CRJ-200 and were not aware of the taxiing Cessna 172. The mechanics did not announce an intention on the airport’s common traffic advisory frequency to increase engine power. After engine power was increased, jet blast lifted the Cessna 172’s tail, which resulted in the Cessna 172 nosing down and sustaining substantial damage to the left wing when it contacted the ground. The mechanics did not comply with the operator’s procedures for high-thrust maintenance operations at a non-towered airport. The procedures included notification of airport management personnel of high-thrust operations, selecting the most appropriate location on the airport, and actively communicating intentions on the airport’s common traffic advisory frequency. Following the accident, the operator reinforced training and communications to mechanics on the risks of high-thrust maintenance operations at nontowered airports. The pilot landed the Cessna 172 at the nontowered airport and taxied toward parking. As the Cessna 172 passed about 200 ft behind a Bombardier CRJ-200 parked on the ramp, two mechanics onboard the CRJ-200 were conducting a maintenance test and were not aware of the Cessna 172. The mechanics increased the CRJ-200’s engine power, and jet blast lifted the Cessna 172’s tail, which resulted in the Cessna 172 nosing down and sustaining substantial damage to the left wing. The mechanics did not follow several of the operator’s procedures for high-thrust maintenance operations at a nontowered airport, including notifying airport management personnel of high-thrust operations, selecting the most appropriate location on the airport, and actively communicating high-thrust intentions on the airport’s common traffic advisory frequency. Their failure to follow these procedures led to their performing high-thrust operations near a taxiing airplane. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Understanding/comprehension-Maintenance personnel
- — Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Knowledge-Knowledge of procedures-Maintenance personnel
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2021_CEN21LA388.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2023 · Reprint (Version printed in journal) Finite Element Simulation of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests for Cessna 172 Aircraft
The NASA Emergency Locator Transmitter Survivability and Reliability project was initiated in 2013 to assess the crash performance standards for the next generation of emergency locator transmitter (E…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Crash Testing and Simulation of a Cessna 172 Aircraft: Pitch Down Impact Onto Soft Soil
During the summer of 2015, NASA Langley Research Center conducted three full-scale crash tests of Cessna 172 (C-172) aircraft at the NASA Langley Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) Simulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 Aircraft
During the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft.
- Semantic Scholar 2020 · Article (Collegiate Aviation Review International) From Classroom to Industry: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Decision-Making
The presence of human factors in aviation remains a critical area of research given the safety implications of human error.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation