CEN22FA197
2022-05-11 · Broomfield, Colorado, United States · Fatal · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport BJC
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s failure to maintain control of the airplane for reasons that could not be determined.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn May 11, 2022, about 1235 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 172N airplane, N73670, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Broomfield, Colorado. The pilot sustained fatal injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 personal flight. The pilot was working on obtaining his commercial pilot certificate via a 14 CFR Part 141 approved course and was performing a local area flight when the accident occurred. A review of automatic dependent surveillance - broadcast data indicated that the airplane departed from the Rocky Mountain Metro Airport (BJC), Broomfield, Colorado, to the southeast and entered the traffic pattern at the Colorado Air and Space Airport (CFO), Watkins, Colorado. The pilot performed a landing at CFO and then departed to the southeast. The pilot performed flight maneuvers to the south of Bennett, Colorado, and then proceeded west to BJC. The pilot performed a touch-and-go landing to runway 12R at BJC and remained in the traffic pattern. The air traffic controller instructed the pilot to widen his downwind leg before turning base for runway 12R due to traffic landing on runway 12L. The controller then changed the landing to runway 12L and cleared the pilot to land. The pilot performed a right turn to the base leg, and after the airplane was established on final for runway 12L, it turned abruptly to the north and descended rapidly. The airplane impacted an intersection about ½ nm northwest of the approach end of runway 12L. The airplane impacted the ground and a traffic light pole and then came to rest on a sidewalk. A postimpact fire ensued and destroyed the airplane. Two witnesses, one who is a designated airworthiness representative (DAR) and the other who is a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) aircraft certification specialist with an aerospace engineer and pilot background, observed the accident sequence while at a nearby golf course. They reported the airplane was not in an aerodynamic stall or spin. The DAR reported that the airplane appeared to be in a “gentle” left-hand turn and descent, with about 15-20° of bank. They did not observe any flight control movements, nor was there any smoke or fire coming from the airplane. They further reported that there were no abnormal engine noises and that the airplane was structurally intact while in flight. A review of local area security camera footage showed the airplane was established on final approach for runway 12L. The airplane then turned abruptly to the north before it descended rapidly and impacted the ground. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe pilot was enrolled at the Western Air Flight Academy, which is based at BJC. He started his training for a commercial pilot certificate on January 11, 2022. A review of the pilot’s logbook found that the pilot had received a pilot-in-command endorsement for a high-performance airplane on January 5, 2022, and he had received 5 hours of ground instruction for mountain flying and high-altitude operations. Due to the fire damage sustained to the logbook, the date for the ground instruction for mountain flying and high-altitude operations could not be determined. The pilot’s logbook also showed that he had flown in the accident airplane multiple times in the past. The pilot worked as a professional truck driver. He passed a Department of Transportation commercial driver’s license medical examination in April 2020. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONAn examination of the airplane’s maintenance records revealed no evidence of any uncorrected mechanical discrepancies with the airframe or the engine. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONA High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model sounding identified possible low-level wind shear close to the surface near the accident site. The National Weather Service issued an Area Forecast Discussion at 1115 and stated in part: Winds will be the greatest operational impact today with VFR conditions. Winds will increase out of the southwest with speeds up to 25 kt then increase after 18z up to 32 kts for DEN and APA with BJC topping out around 25 kts. Winds will shift more westerly after 14z and be due west after 16z with gusting up to 32 kts. The estimated density altitude for BJC at the time of the accident was 8,578 ft above msl. AIRPORT INFORMATIONAn examination of the airplane’s maintenance records revealed no evidence of any uncorrected mechanical discrepancies with the airframe or the engine. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONThe wreckage was recovered from the accident site and was transported to a salvage facility for further examination. Most of the airframe was consumed by the postimpact fire. No bird remnants were observed in the wreckage. Flight control continuity was established for all of the flight controls. The flaps were found positioned about 30° at the time of impact. There was no evidence of an asymmetric flap deployment. The engine was separated from the airframe and intact. Cylinder No.1 sustained impact damage. The propeller showed chordwise scratching on one blade. The other blade was bent, about midspan, to the rear about 90°. During the examination there were no signs of a preimpact mechanical malfunction or failure with the airframe or the engine that would have precluded normal operation. ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONLow-Level Wind Shear The FAA has published Wind Shear FAA-P-8740-40. This document discusses low-level wind shear and states in part: Another type of surface obstruction—mountains—can also affect wind shear. Some airfields are close to mountain ranges, and mountain passes are close to the final approach paths. Strong surface winds blowing through these passes can cause serious localized wind shear during the approach. The real problem with such shear is that it is almost totally unpredictable in terms of magnitude or severity. A pilot can expect such shear whenever strong surface winds are present. Density Altitude The FAA has published Density Altitude FAA-P-8740-2. This document discusses density altitude and states in part: Density altitude is formally defined as “pressure altitude corrected for nonstandard temperature variations.” The formal definition of density altitude is certainly correct, but the important thing to understand is that density altitude is an indicator of aircraft performance. The term comes from the fact that the density of the air decreases with altitude. A “high” density altitude means that air density is reduced, which has an adverse impact on aircraft performance. Whether due to high altitude, high temperature, or both, reduced air density (reported in terms of density altitude) adversely affects aerodynamic performance and decreases the engine’s horsepower output. Flight track data indicated that the pilot was returning to the departure airport. The pilot had flown to a nearby airport and then performed several flight maneuvers in a nearby practice area. He performed a touch and go landing and then remained in the traffic pattern. The air traffic controller instructed the pilot to widen his downwind leg, due to traffic, and changed the landing runway to the parallel runway. The pilot performed a right turn to the base leg, and after the airplane was established on final, it abruptly turned to the north and descended rapidly. The airplane impacted an intersection about ½ nautical mile (nm) northwest of the approach end of the runway. The airplane impacted the ground and a traffic light pole and came to rest on a sidewalk. A postimpact fire ensued and the airplane was destroyed. Two witnesses reported that the airplane was not in an aerodynamic stall or spin. One witness reported that the airplane appeared to be in a “gentle” left-hand turn and descent, with about 15-20° of bank. They did not observe any flight control movements, nor was there any smoke or fire from the airplane. There were no abnormal engine noises, and the airplane was structurally intact while in flight. A review of local area security camera footage showed the airplane established on final approach. The airplane then turned abruptly to the north and descended rapidly before it impacted the ground. Postaccident examination revealed no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation. A review of meteorological data showed that low-level windshear was possible. Additionally, the estimated density altitude at the airport was 8,578 ft above msl at the time of the accident. However, based on the witness statements and the security camera footage, neither windshear nor the high density altitude appeared to play a role in the airplane’s sudden departure from the approach path. The reasons for the loss of control in flight could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot
- — Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_CEN22FA197.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (wind shear, stall, loss of control, maintenance). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2023 · Reprint (Version printed in journal) Finite Element Simulation of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests for Cessna 172 Aircraft
The NASA Emergency Locator Transmitter Survivability and Reliability project was initiated in 2013 to assess the crash performance standards for the next generation of emergency locator transmitter (E…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Crash Testing and Simulation of a Cessna 172 Aircraft: Pitch Down Impact Onto Soft Soil
During the summer of 2015, NASA Langley Research Center conducted three full-scale crash tests of Cessna 172 (C-172) aircraft at the NASA Langley Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) Simulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 Aircraft
During the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Semantic Scholar 2020 · Article (Collegiate Aviation Review International) From Classroom to Industry: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Decision-Making
The presence of human factors in aviation remains a critical area of research given the safety implications of human error.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Optimal recovery from microburst wind shear
The flight path of a twin-jet transport aircraft is optimized in a microburst encounter during approach to landing. The objective is to execute an escape maneuver that maintains safe ground clearance …