Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / CEN22LA202

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event CEN22LA202

2022-05-15 Monroe, Louisiana, United States Airport · MLU None 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Registry · N619AC

FAA Aircraft Registry record.

Make / Model

CESSNA 421C

Year of manufacture

1977 · 45 years old at event

Engine

CONT MOTOR GTSI0-520-F-K (435 hp)

Seats / Engines

8 seats · 2 engines

Last airworthiness date

19770809

ADS-B equipped

Yes — Mode-S A81030

Registrant of record

FEED YARD INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS LLC

Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

The failure of the maintenance personnel to properly reinstall the elevator trim tab hardware, which resulted in an in-flight separation of the elevator.

Factual narrative

On May 15, 2022, about 1320 central daylight time, a Cessna 421C, N619AC, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Monroe, Louisiana. The pilot and five passengers were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot stated that immediately after departure from Morehouse Memorial Airport (BQP), Bastrop, Louisiana, he heard a loud pop and the control yoke oscillated violently. He declared an emergency and diverted to Monroe Regional Airport (MLU), Monroe, Louisiana, about 16 miles southwest, for a longer runway and emergency services. The control yoke and airplane continued to oscillate until the airplane was on final approach, about 3 miles from MLU, then the oscillation stopped. The pilot landed the airplane without further incident. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the right elevator had mostly separated from the horizontal stabilizer and only a small portion of the inboard elevator remained attached. There was a small puncture on the right side of the rudder. The elevator trim push-pull rube remained attached to the trim actuator; however, there was no bolt, nut, or cotter pin attached to the aft fork connection, and the trim tab was missing. The push-pull tube did not exhibit any preaccident damage or anomalies. The remainder of right elevator and trim tab were not located. A review of the airplane’s maintenance logbooks revealed that the elevator trim system was re-rigged on May 13, 2022, two days before the accident. The maintenance personnel who completed the work and signed off on the logbook stated that he did not ensure that the push-pull tube hardware was reinstalled. He added that he checked everything else but missed that step. The airplane had accumulated about 4 hours of flight time since the elevator trim maintenance was completed. As a result of the accident, the maintenance facility updated their company practices to include a secondary inspection sign-off and updated their work order close out procedures. The pilot stated that, immediately after departure, he heard a loud pop and the control yoke oscillated violently. He declared an emergency and diverted to an airport with a longer runway and emergency services. The control yoke and airplane continued to oscillate until the airplane was on final approach, then the oscillation stopped. The pilot landed the airplane without further incident. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the right elevator had mostly separated from the horizontal stabilizer and only a small portion of the inboard elevator remained attached. There was a small puncture on the right side of the rudder, likely from the elevator impacting the rudder when it separated in flight. The elevator trim push-pull tube remained attached to the trim actuator; however, there was no bolt, nut, or cotter pin attached to the aft fork connection, and the trim tab was missing. The push-pull tube did not exhibit any preaccident damage or anomalies. The remainder of right elevator and trim tab were not located. The elevator trim system was re-rigged two days before the accident. The maintenance personnel stated that they did not ensure that the push-pull tube hardware was reinstalled. The load applied between the push pull tube and the trim tab held the bolt in place for 4 flight hours, and it’s likely that every time there was no load on the bolt it was able to move. Once the bolt finally backed out, the trim tab would have been free to move without control. It is likely that the freely moving trim tab resulted in the airplane oscillation and ultimately the in-flight separation of the elevator. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12

NTSB Findings

Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).

  • Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Installation-Maintenance personnel

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_2022_CEN22LA202.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

What the literature says.

Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.

Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗