CEN22LA258
2022-06-18 · Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport UES
Current FAA registration · N226SA
- Make / Model
- EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND GMBH EC 135 P2+
- Year of manufacture
- 2007 · 15 years old at event
- Engine
- P&W CANADA PW206B (431 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 7 seats · 2 engines
- Last airworthiness date
- 20070525
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A1F8DC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The separation and subsequent ingestion of the fenestron fairing cover into the fenestron blades for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On June 18, 2022, about 1710 central daylight time, a Eurocopter Deutschland Gmbh EC-135 P2+ helicopter, N226SA, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident near Waukesha, Wisconsin. The pilot and 3 passengers were not injured. The helicopter was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 135 air medical flight. According to the operator, the pilot received a flight request for an inter-facility transfer flight. The intended route of flight was from the aircraft's primary base at Waukesha County Airport (UES) to pick up a patient at Aurora Lakeland Medical Center, Elkhorn, Wisconsin, and transport them to Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. After departing from UES when the helicopter about 150 ft agl, the pilot heard a thump, and the helicopter pitched up. The pilot immediately executed an emergency landing, and all occupants exited the helicopter uninjured. The pilot had full control of the helicopter during the emergency landing. The helicopter sustained substantial damage to the fenestron blades. The accident site was situated over a large area adjacent to a concrete ramp and taxiway. The fairing cover was missing from fenestron assembly. Debris was found about 600 ft in all directions. The debris consisted of fenestron fairing (hub cover) fragments, composite fragments from the fenestron body, attachment bolts, and brackets. Some debris was found on top of a one-story hangar rooftop. Small fragments of the fairing cover were found scattered on the ramp and the top of the one-story hangar. Larger fragments of the fairing cover were found wedged between the fenestron housing and the fenestron blades. The fairing fragments that were found showed damage consistent with ingestion into the rotating blades of the fenestron. There was no evidence of a bird strike present. After an extensive search of the accident area, investigators were unable to identify any foreign debris that might have come into contact with the cover before its separation. Other than the fenestron fairing cover and fenestron housing, the entire helicopter (airframe and engine) had no other damage or missing hardware/components. The fenestron blades within the fenestron housing were found attached with no evidence of malfunction. The fenestron blades and the inside of fenestron housing were impact damaged, consistent with ingestion of the fragments from the fenestron fairing cover. No evidence of preaccident malfunctions of the fenestron housing, blades, gearbox, or drive were found. No improper maintenance anomalies were found with the fenestron assembly. Along with multiple fragments of the fenestron fairing cover, five of the fenestron fairing cover attachment bolts were found attached to their respective brackets, and all were torqued. A sixth bolt was not found; however, a portion of the sixth bolt’s bracket was found embedded in a faring cover fragment, consistent with the bolt being attached before the accident. All faring cover attachment hardware was accounted for and showed no evidence of preaccident material failure. On an exemplar fenestron assembly, a security test of the fenestron fairing cover was conducted with various combinations of retaining bolts and clips. The fairing cover was attached to the exemplar fenestron assembly with six attachment bolts, brackets, and anchors. The hub cover was secure. Two of the bolts were removed, and the fairing cover remained secure. Two more bolts were removed, and with only two bolts remaining, and the fairing cover remained secure. The helicopter flew about 5.8 hours without incident after the most recent maintenance of the fenestron. Since the fenestron maintenance, numerous daily maintenance checks and pilot prefights were conducted, with no unresolved items or anomalies. No uncorrected maintenance anomalies were found in the maintenance logbooks. There were six historical events involving the fenestron faring cover separating from the same model helicopter. All six events were related to FOD ingestions that caused the fenestron fairing cover to separate. After takeoff during an air medical flight, about 150 ft above ground level (agl), the pilot heard a "thump,” and the helicopter pitched up. The pilot immediately executed an emergency landing, and all occupants exited the helicopter uninjured. The helicopter sustained substantial damage to the fenestron blades. Examination of the helicopter at the accident site revealed that the fairing cover was missing from fenestron assembly and was found fragmented about 600 ft in all directions. There was no evidence of a bird strike. The fairing cover fragments that were found showed damage consistent with ingestion into the rotating blades of the fenestron. All attachment hardware for the cover were accounted for and showed no evidence of preaccident failure. The damage to the fenestron housing was consistent with object ingestion. No preaccident failures or malfunctions were found with the fenestron body, fenestron blades, gearbox, or fenestron drive. The helicopter flew about 5.8 hours without incident after the most recent maintenance of the fenestron and no uncorrected maintenance anomalies were found in the maintenance logbooks. The reason for the separation and subsequent ingestion of the fenestron fairing cover into the fenestron blades could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft propeller/rotor-Tail rotor-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_CEN22LA258.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…