NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CEN23LA106
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined.
Factual narrative
On February 11, 2023, about 1406 central standard time, a Jabiru J250-SP light sport airplane, N592J, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Courtland, Illinois. The pilot and passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The accident airplane was being flown from Bomar Field/Shelbyville Municipal Airport (SYI), Shelbyville, Tennessee, after a replacement engine was installed. According to the airplane owner/pilot, the maintenance facility had conducted about 4 hours of flight testing after the engine installation was completed. Additionally, the pilot flew 4 takeoffs and landings on the day before the accident, before the return trip home to Waukesha County Airport (UES), Waukesha, Wisconsin. According to the pilot, the flight departed SYI about 0945 with full fuel. The pilot and passenger arrived at Ohio County Airport (JQD), Hartford, Kentucky, about 1100 for a short break. The preflight inspection and departure from JQD were normal. The pilot reported that, about 1406, during cruise flight at 4,500 ft msl en route to UES, the engine suddenly stopped producing power. The pilot noted that there were no warnings or other indications leading up to the event. After declaring an emergency and diverting toward the nearest airport, the pilot made 4-5 attempts to restart the engine. The pilot stated that the engine would start momentarily but then lose power 3-4 seconds later with the propeller coming to a stop after each attempt. In addition, the flight displays would turn on and off along with the engine with no usable information; however, the radios continued to function. The pilot attempted to divert to Dekalb Taylor Municipal Airport (DKB), Dekalb, Illinois. However, when it became apparent that reaching DKB would not be possible, she executed a forced landing to a muddy field. The airplane came to rest on its nose, with damage to the fuselage and right wing. Examination of the airplane at the accident site determined that about six gallons of fuel was present in the left-wing fuel tank. A small, undetermined amount of fuel was present in the right-wing fuel tank; however, the right wing was damaged in the impact sequence. The carburetor bowl contained fluid consistent with fuel. A postaccident engine examination did not reveal any mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation. Review of the airplane service manual revealed that the total fuel capacity was 36 gallons. The published endurance was 6.5 hours with a fuel reserve, and the published fuel consumption was 4.5 to 5.5 gph. The maintenance facility representative noted that the normal fuel consumption for the airplane is about 6 gph. However, during an engine break in period, fuel consumption can be as high as 7 gph. According to a representative of the airplane maintenance facility, the airplane’s EFIS systems will not operate below 10.5 volts. When attempting an in-flight engine restart using the starter, the EFIS systems will reboot due to the drop in voltage. Multiple attempts with the starter would have caused the EFIS to continue rebooting. The radios operate on much lower voltage and will continue to operate when the starter is engaged. The accident airplane was being flown to the pilot/owner’s home after a replacement engine had been installed. According to the pilot, the maintenance facility had conducted about 4 hours of flight testing after the engine installation was completed. Additionally, the pilot flew 4 takeoffs and landings on the day before the accident flight. The airplane was fully fueled before the flight on the morning of the accident. After an initial flight of about 1 1/4 hours, the pilot and passenger landed for a short break. The subsequent takeoff and initial portion of the accident flight were uneventful. However, about 2 1/2 hours after takeoff, during cruise flight at 4,500 feet mean sea level (msl), the engine suddenly stopped producing power. The pilot’s efforts to restore engine power were not successful, and she executed a forced landing to a muddy field. The airplane came to rest on its nose, with damage to the fuselage and right wing. Examination of the airplane at the accident site determined that about six gallons of fuel were present in the left-wing fuel tank. A small, undetermined amount of fuel was present in the right-wing fuel tank; however, the right wing was damaged during the impact sequence. A postrecovery engine examination noted fuel in the carburetor bowl. The examination did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The total fuel capacity was 36 gallons, and the fuel consumption ranged from 5.5 to 7.0 gph. As a result, the expected fuel consumption for a 4-hour flight would be about 28 gallons. The investigation was unable to identify any cause for the loss of engine power during cruise flight. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Power plant-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2023_CEN23LA106.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗