CEN23LA124
2022-11-27 · Waco, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport ACT
Current FAA registration · N9468T
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 210
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR I0-470 SERIES (260 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AD26F4
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The nose landing gear retract arm separation for reasons that could not be determined.
Factual narrative
On November 27, 2022, about 1430 central standard time, a Cessna 210 airplane, N9468T, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Waco, Texas. The pilot and two passengers were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that shortly after takeoff the airplane felt “sluggish,” so she looked out the window at the mirror on the wing and noticed the main wheels were retracted but the nose gear was partially extended. The right seat passenger, who was also a pilot, stated that he also observed that the nose gear was partially extended. The pilot recycled the landing gear and the three landing gear wheels retracted; the flight continued to the destination. The airplane owner, who was seated in the rear seat, reported that the gear only partially came up because the pilot moved the gear handle to the neutral position before the gear completed the retraction process. As the airplane neared the destination airport, the pilot entered the traffic pattern and lowered the landing gear. The pilot stated that the gear-down indication light was green, which indicated that the gear was in the down and locked position, and confirmed the gear was down by looking at the mirror on the wing. The passengers also confirmed that the gear was down and locked. The pilot turned the airplane onto final approach, reduced engine power, and lowered the flaps. The right seat passenger reported that the approach was “normal.” The pilot stated that the airplane touched down on the main wheels followed by the nosewheel; however, upon touchdown of the nosewheel, the nose gear did not feel “locked into place and felt spongey.” The airplane bounced and the propeller struck the ground. The rear seat passenger reported that he thought the approach looked low, and the pilot seemed flustered. He also reported that the nose was low, and the pilot did not flare when she came over the numbers, which led to the nosewheel contacting the runway before the main landing gear. The rear seat passenger reported the airplane bounced and porpoised multiple times before coming to rest upright on the runway. Initially this accident was classified as an incident due to the lack of reported substantial damage, and the airplane was released and sold for salvage. Upon being notified by the owner of reported additional damage several months later, the airplane was examined after the airplane had been partially disassembled. Due to the partial disassembly, the airplane landing gear system was compromised and could not be functionally tested. The examination revealed substantial damage to the fuselage bulkhead because the nose landing gear retract arm was pulled and separated from the bulkhead. The pilot reported that after takeoff she had to recycle the landing gear because the nose gear would not retract when she retracted the landing gear. The airplane owner, who was seated in the rear seat, reported that the landing gear was functioning normally and that the nose gear did not retract due to the pilot putting the gear handle in the neutral position before the landing gear fully retracted. After the pilot recycled the landing gear it retracted without further issue and the flight proceeded to the destination. Before landing the pilot and two passengers confirmed the landing gear was extended by visual confirmation and as indicated by the cockpit landing gear indicators. The pilot reported the airplane touched down on the main landing gear, followed by the nose landing gear. When the nose landing gear touched down, the pilot felt like the nose landing gear was not locked. The airplane bounced, the propeller struck the runway, and the airplane came to rest upright. The airplane owner stated the airplane touched down on the nose wheel, porpoised multiple times, and came to rest upright. Due to the lack of reported substantial damage, the accident was initially classified as an incident. Several months later, the airplane owner reported additional damage was observed to the forward fuselage bulkhead and other structure. The nose landing gear retract arm was pulled and separated from the bulkhead. During the time between the accident and the notification of additional damage, the airplane was sold for salvage and partially disassembled. Due to the partial disassembly, the landing gear system was compromised and could not be functionally tested. As a result, the investigation was unable to determine if the reported landing gear malfunction occurred before or during the runway contact. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_CEN23LA124.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type. All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2020 · Technical Memorandum (TM) Evaluation Issues for a Flight Deck Interface; CAST SE-210 Output 2: Report 4 of 6
This report is part of a series of reports that addresses flight deck design and evaluation, written as a response to loss of control accidents.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper Utilizing Drones to Streamline Wildlife Hazard Management Efforts by Airport Operators
Airports operating under the Code of Federal Regulations Part 139 should conduct a wildlife hazard assessment (WHA) when some wildlife-strike events have occurred at or near the airport.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR) Flight test investigation of certification issues pertaining to general-aviation-type aircraft with natural laminar flow
Development of Natural Laminar Flow (NLF) technology for application to general aviation-type aircraft has raised some question as to the adequacy of FAR Part 23 for certification of aircraft with sig…
- arXiv 2012 · arXiv preprint A mathematical model of sap exudation in maple trees governed by ice melting, gas dissolution and osmosis
We develop a mathematical model for sap exudation in a maple tree that is based on a purely physical mechanism for internal pressure generation in trees in the leafless state.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2001 · Journal article (JAAER) A Comparison of the Learning Styles of Aviation and Non-Aviation College Students
In contrast to established educational fields such as mathematics, the discipline of aviation education is relatively young.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 1992 · Journal article (JAAER) A Turning Point in Aviation Training: The AQP Mandates Crew Resource Management and Line Operational Simulations
Crew Resource Management (CRM) and Line Oriented Flight Training (LOFT) have not been mandatory elements of air carrier flight crew training.