CEN23LA246
2023-06-18 · College Station, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport CLL
Current FAA registration · N463HP
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA 46-350P
- Year of manufacture
- 2002 · 21 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING TI0-540 SER (310 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20020524
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A5A57D
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The mechanic’s failure to properly secure the oil suction screen plug during recent maintenance, which resulted in an oil leak and subsequent loss of engine power due to oil starvation.
Factual narrative
On June 18, 2023, about 0843 central daytime time, a Piper PA46-350P airplane, N463HP, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near College Station, Texas. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that, during the climb through 4,000 ft mean sea level (msl), the oil temperature began increasing to 215°F, which was higher than the normal range of 190-200°F. The pilot reduced the airplane’s climb rate to increase cooling, but the oil temperature continued to climb to 230°F. At that time, the pilot requested an instrument clearance back to Easterwood Field Airport (CLL), College Station, Texas. While receiving vectors for the RNAV 11 approach at CLL, the pilot descended to about 2,000 ft msl when he noted smoke in the cabin and a loss of engine power. Unable to glide to any runway, the pilot selected a field to perform a forced landing. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the wings and fuselage during the forced landing. Eleven days before the accident flight, on June 7, 2023, the pilot was conducting a cross-country flight when he observed decreased manifold pressure and a partial loss of engine power. The pilot diverted to CLL, where after troubleshooting, an aviation mechanic told the pilot that the turbocharger required replacement. After the turbocharger was replaced, the mechanic completed an uneventful engine test run. An engine logbook entry dated June 16, 2023, stated that in addition to replacing the turbocharger, the mechanic drained the engine oil, opened the oil filter, and cleaned the oil pickup screen, where a small amount of metal was observed. The oil sump was flushed, and 11 quarts of new oil added to the engine. The maintenance logbook entry noted that after the maintenance, the engine ran normally at 42 inches of manifold pressure. Postaccident examination of the engine was conducted with the assistance of a technical representative from Lycoming Engines. The engine oil sump contained about 2 quarts of oil, and the recovered oil displayed evidence of metal contamination. The oil filter was removed, and the filter material was found to be saturated with metallic particles. There was no evidence of any loose or disconnected oil lines. Engine crankshaft continuity was established with cylinder compression noted on all cylinders except for cylinder No. 6. The sparkplugs exhibited signatures of normal operation. The oil suction screen plug located in the oil sump was found not secured with safety wire as required per the manufacturer’s maintenance manual. There was no evidence that the plug or its required safety wire were damaged by other objects. The oil suction screen plug was found loose, with engine oil observed below the oil suction screen plug. The crush washer behind the oil screen plug was found intact with no damage. A portion of the oil dipstick port and fractured crankcase were submitted for additional metallurgical examination. The laboratory examination revealed no evidence of material defects in the crankcase material, and the observed fracture features were consistent with overload. Additional laboratory analysis of the metallic debris recovered from the oil suction screen was consistent with connecting rod material as well as steel from fittings, fasteners, and brackets. While climbing the airplane to cruise altitude after takeoff, the pilot observed an increase in engine oil temperature above the normal range and requested to return to the departure airport. While receiving vectors for an instrument approach, the pilot saw smoke in the cabin and the engine lost total power. Unable to glide to any runway, the pilot selected a field for the forced landing, during which the airplane sustained substantial damage to the wings and fuselage. Postaccident examination revealed that about 2 quarts of oil remained in the engine, and the recovered oil displayed evidence of metal contamination. There was evidence of an oil leak in the engine compartment and along the lower fuselage. There was evidence of a crankcase fracture near the oil dip stick port; however, a laboratory examination determined the fracture to be consistent with overload and likely due to impact-related damage. The engine exhibited no evidence of any loose or disconnected oil lines. The oil filter was removed, and the filter material was found to be saturated with metallic particles. The oil suction screen plug, located on the oil sump, was not secured with safety wire as required per the manufacturer’s maintenance manual. There was no evidence that the plug or required safety wire was damaged by other objects. The oil suction screen plug was found to be loose, with engine oil observed below the oil suction screen plug. The crush washer behind the oil screen plug was intact and exhibited no damage. Laboratory analysis of the metallic debris recovered from the oil suction screen was consistent with connecting rod material as well as steel from fittings, fasteners, and brackets. The metallic debris found in the recovered oil, oil filter, and oil suction screen was likely due to mechanical damage associated with oil starvation. Eleven days before the accident flight, the pilot observed decreased engine manifold pressure and a partial loss of engine power. He diverted to an airport, where he had the turbocharger replaced by an aviation mechanic. In addition to replacing the turbocharger, the mechanic also drained and replaced the engine oil, which included removal and reinstallation of the oil suction screen plug. The loss of engine power was likely due to a loss of oil during the flight that led to oil starvation within the engine. The loose oil suction screen plug, the absence of safety wire on the plug, and the evidence of an oil leak beneath the plug were consistent with the mechanic’s failure to properly secure the oil suction screen plug during recent maintenance. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-(general)-Maintenance personnel
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng oil sys-Incorrect service/maintenance
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2023_CEN23LA246.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.