CEN24LA037
2023-11-11 · McKinney, Texas, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport T31
Current FAA registration · N751HP
- Make / Model
- HAYES CHARLES L HAYES IVP TURBINE
- Year of manufacture
- 2002 · 21 years old at event
- Engine
- AMA/EXPR UNKNOWN ENG
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20020414
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AA1E7D
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s failure to attain the proper touchdown point during landing, which resulted in a runway excursion and collision with terrain and a vehicle.
Factual narrative
On November 11, 2023, about 1241 central standard time, an experimental amateur-built Lancair IVP Turbine airplane, N751HP, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident near McKinney, Texas. The pilot and passenger were not injured, and an occupant in an automobile sustained minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. According to the pilot, while at FL 250 west of Abilene, Texas, the cockpit door seal failed, and the airplane sustained a sudden loss of pressurization. The pilot contacted air traffic control for an immediate descent. The pilot descended the airplane to 10,000 ft msl and continued the flight to Aero Country Airport (T31), McKinney, Texas. Following the emergency descent, the pilot noted no aircraft systems anomalies. About 5 minutes after establishing cruise flight at 10,000 ft to T31, the pilot noted an amber caution light for the propeller rpm which was indicating 1,920 rpm. The pilot reduced the propeller rpm to 1,800 and the caution light turned off. The pilot continued the flight to T31. The pilot reported he had not previously landed at T31 and performed a touch and go landing on runway 17 “to see the field.” The pilot climbed the airplane to the traffic pattern altitude and flew a normal traffic pattern to land on runway 17. During the downwind leg, the pilot pulled back the power lever and the ball on top of the lever (see Figure 1) came off in his hand. The pilot handed the ball to the passenger and continued the landing at the flight idle power position. Figure 1. Cockpit power lever and ball. The pilot stated the airplane touched down in the first 500 ft of the runway without a float or a bounce in ground effect; he immediately “hit [the] brakes gently” and maintained the runway centerline. For about 5 to 10 seconds, the pilot unsuccessfully attempted to move the power lever into beta-reverse. The pilot applied maximum braking; however, the brakes faded, and the stopping power decreased. The airplane exited the end of the runway, went through an airport perimeter fence, and struck a moving vehicle on a roadway. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and right wing. ADS-B and avionics data showed the airplane’s groundspeed was between 96 and 99 knots and the flaps were extended to 40° during the final approach. A witness, located on a general aviation ramp on the east side of T31, video recorded the airplane’s landing on his cellular telephone. The video showed the airplane touch down, bounce, and touch down again near the midpoint of the 3,002 ft asphalt runway and evidence of braking action (smoke from main landing gear wheels/tires) occurred about 3 seconds later. The wheel/tire smoke continued until the airplane exited the runway surface. According to the T31 airport manager who examined the runway surface after the accident, the first visible tire skid marks were about 200 ft past the midpoint of the runway. The skid marks remained visible for about 1,300 ft until the airplane departed the end of the asphalt surface. The airplane continued 14 ft to the perimeter fence and then traveled 93 ft to the spot where it collided with a moving automobile in the roadway. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed cable continuity from the cockpit power lever to the propeller governor. The cockpit control lever, without the ball top, was actuated between full power and the reverse positions with no anomalies noted. The cockpit door seal was intact, and no damage was noted to the seal adhesive or materials. A review of the aircraft maintenance records revealed that on March 29, 2022, the original Hayes IVP Turbine experimental airplane was modified with a RDD Enterprises, LLC, LX7 kit, which included major modifications to the fuselage, wings, empennage, and turbine engine. After the completion of the modifications, the airplane was placed back into the airplane’s Phase 1 operating limitations flight test program for purposes of testing the LX7 conversion. Per the airplane maintenance records, on August 26, 2022, and 11.3 hours since the completion of the modifications, the airplane completed the Phase 1 flight test hour requirements. According to RDD Enterprises, LLC, the landing roll distance is 800 ft (at maximum landing weight), and the landing distance over a 50 ft obstacle is 1,800 ft. The pilot also reported that before delivery and after he acquired the airplane, the airplane sustained several discrepancies and issues, including a door seal that failed during pre-delivery flight testing. The pilot reported that while in cruise at flight level (FL) 250, the airplane sustained a sudden loss of pressurization. He descended the airplane to 10,000 ft mean sea level (msl) and continued to his planned destination. He had not previously landed at the destination airport, so he performed a touch and go landing “to see the field,” and then flew a standard traffic pattern for landing. On the downwind leg the ball on the top of the power lever unscrewed and the pilot continued the approach. The pilot reported the airplane touched down in the first 500 ft of the runway without a float or a bounce in ground effect. He immediately “hit [the] brakes gently” and maintained the runway centerline. For about 5 to 10 seconds, the pilot unsuccessfully attempted to move the power lever into beta-reverse and applied maximum braking; however, the brakes faded, and the stopping power decreased. The airplane subsequently exited the end of the runway, went through an airport perimeter fence, and struck a moving vehicle on a roadway. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and right wing. A review of a cellular telephone camera video provided to the National Transportation Safety Board showed that the airplane touched down near the midpoint of the 3,002 ft runway, bounced and touched down again. Tire skid marks were observed about 200 ft beyond the runway’s midpoint and continued for about 1,300 ft until the airplane exited the runway surface. Automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) and avionics data showed the airplane’s groundspeed was between 96 and 99 knots and the flaps were extended to 40° during the final approach. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded a normal landing. Although the power lever ball top unscrewed, the power lever functioned normally between full power and reverse settings. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Descent/approach/glide path-Not attained/maintained
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2023_CEN24LA037.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (runway excursion, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article Runway Excursion — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary runway excursion review — RE-OE (overruns) + RE-LO (lateral). Risk drivers: long landing, high approach speed, contaminated surface, tailwind, mis-set autobrakes.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.