CEN24LA120
2024-02-25 · Patterson, Louisiana, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PTN
Current FAA registration · N72BH
- Make / Model
- HARTLINE JOHN BON HARTLINE PULSAR I
- Year of manufacture
- 1990 · 34 years old at event
- Engine
- BOMBARDIER ROTAX (ALL)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19900718
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A9A154
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The non-certificated pilot’s decision to operate an unairworthy engine, which led to cylinder failure and a loss of engine power.
Factual narrative
On February 25, 2024, about 1645 central standard time, a Pulsar 1 airplane, N72BH, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Patterson, Louisiana. The pilot sustained serious injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 personal flight. The owner, who was flying the airplane at the time of the accident, did not provide a report of the accident. Airplane registration documents indicated that the amateur-built airplane was purchased by the owner on November 22, 2023. According to the owner, the accident flight was the airplane’s first flight after the purchase. Shortly after takeoff, the airplane’s engine lost all power, and the owner attempted to land the airplane in an open area on airport property. During the attempted landing, the airplane struck a fence and impacted the ground. A postimpact fire ensued and destroyed the airplane. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the fuselage cabin section and inboard wings were almost completely destroyed by the postimpact fire. The examination confirmed flight control system continuity to the extent possible. The airplane was powered by a Rotax model 582 2-stroke engine. A partial teardown examination revealed internal corrosion on the No. 2 cylinder wall and on the No.2 connecting rod. There was evidence that the No. 2 piston had seized within its cylinder. No other preimpact anomalies were noted. According to engine maintenance records, the engine had undergone an overhaul on October 21, 2014, and was installed on the accident airplane on August 22, 2015. There was an entry for a condition inspection on November 6, 2016, and no further entries until January 15, 2024, which indicated that the propeller reduction gearbox was removed and sent to a Rotax mechanic for overhaul and modification of the gear reduction ratio. Another entry dated January 17, 2024, indicated that the engine control cables were replaced. The airframe maintenance records were reviewed, and the most recent entry, dated November 6, 2016, indicated that a condition inspection was performed on that date. The engine operating manual details procedures for preserving the engine for various periods of inactivity. However, no maintenance entries were found indicating that the storage procedures had been completed. At the time of the accident, the owner did not hold a pilot certificate. He previously held a student pilot certificate, but it was revoked by the FAA in 1975. The owner, who was flying the airplane at the time of the accident, purchased the airplane about three months before the accident; the accident flight was the airplane’s first flight after the purchase. The airplane’s engine lost all power shortly after takeoff, and the airplane was destroyed by impact forces and a post-impact fire. The non-certificated pilot was seriously injured; he did not provide a report of the accident; however, a postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the engine’s No. 2 cylinder had seized. A teardown examination of the engine revealed corrosion on the cylinder walls and the internal components of the No. 2 cylinder. No other preimpact anomalies were noted. Review of maintenance records showed that the airplane had not received an annual condition inspection for over 7 years. Additionally, other than maintenance performed on the propeller reduction gearbox and engine controls, no maintenance was recorded for the remainder of the engine. There were no entries indicating compliance with the manufacturer’s recommended procedures for engine preservation during periods of inactivity. At the time of the accident, the owner did not have a pilot certificate. He previously held a student pilot certificate, but it was revoked by the FAA in 1975. Based on the condition of the engine’s interior, the engine had likely not been properly prepared for long-term storage, which allowed corrosion to develop on the No. 2 cylinder components. The loss of engine power was related to the non-certificated pilot’s decision to operate the engine despite the lack of maintenance, which resulted in a seizure during operation due to corrosion. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Power plant-(general)-Not serviced/maintained
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng cyl section-Failure
- — Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2024_CEN24LA120.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.