CEN24LA269
2024-07-16 · Avoca, Nebraska, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A partial loss of engine power due to the loose left magneto which resulted in erratic engine timing.
Factual narrative
On July 16, 2024, about 1430 central daylight time, a Piper PA-36-375 airplane, N2386X, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Avoca, Nebraska. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 137 aerial application flight. The pilot reported that he maneuvered the airplane for his fourth spray pass and had rolled the airplane level at an altitude of about 300 ft above ground level when the airplane “lost all power” and began to descend. He added full power and pushed the propeller control full forward, but did not feel the engine respond and the airplane continued to descend. After he dumped the hopper tank load, he still was not able to stop the airplane’s descent. The airplane touched down in the field and continued through a cattle fence before coming to rest, resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage and left wing. The airplane was recovered to a secure facility for further examination. There was a crack observed between the Nos. 1, 2, and 3 cylinders; however, no thermal distress was found within the engine. Internal continuity was confirmed throughout the engine and borescope examination of the cylinders revealed no anomalies. Examination of the fuel divider, injectors, servo, and pump revealed no anomalies. The oil filter was removed and contained no contamination. The air inlet and filter were free of debris. While still attached to the engine, the left magneto flange could be rotated slightly. Both magnetos were removed and rotated by hand. The right magneto made a “clunking” sound when rotated and rattled when shaken. Both magnetos produced spark at their terminal leads. Further examination of the magnetos found the right magneto distributor gear was timed correctly. Both coil wedges were loose in the housing. The coil wedges appeared to have been initially wedged in place, but only had minimal marring, which may not have provided enough tension to retain the wedges properly. A review of maintenance records found that the magneto was overhauled on November 27, 2023, and was installed on the airplane on April 12, 2024. The airplane had flown about 40 hours since the magneto installation. The left magneto was in good condition and subsequently bench tested. The magneto operated as expected. The pilot reported that, during an aerial application flight, the engine lost power and the airplane began to descend. He added full power and pushed the propeller control full forward, but did not feel the engine respond and the airplane continued to descend. After he dumped the hopper tank, he still was not able to stop the airplane’s descent, and the airplane touched down in the field and continued through a cattle fence, resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage and left wing. The airplane was recovered to a secure facility for further examination. There was a crack observed between the Nos. 1, 2, and 3 cylinders that was most likely the result of impact damage. Examination of the magnetos revealed that, while still attached to the engine, the left magneto could be rotated at its flange. Both magnetos were removed and spun by hand and both magnetos produced spark at their terminal leads. The right magneto made a “clunking” sound when rotated and rattled when shaken. Further examination revealed that the right magneto coil wedges were loose in the housing. The coil wedges appeared to have been initially wedged in place, but only exhibited minimal marring, and may not have been secured sufficiently. That the left magneto was found loose and could be rotated at its flange, it’s likely it was out of time. Although the right magneto coil wedges were loose in the housing, it is more likely the left magneto firing at the wrong time would have had the most significant impact on the engine only being able to produce partial power. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Ignition system-Magneto/distributor-Malfunction
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2024_CEN24LA269.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.