CEN24LA271
2024-07-16 · Eagle Lake, Texas, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Current FAA registration · N609RP
- Make / Model
- MCDONNELL DOUGLAS HELICOPTER 600N
- Year of manufacture
- 1997 · 27 years old at event
- Engine
- ALLISON 250-C47 (600 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19980820
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A7EA33
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The operator’s improper installation of the fuel system, which resulted in fuel starvation, a loss of engine power, and impact with terrain.
Factual narrative
On July 16, 2024, at 0055 central daylight time, a McDonnell Douglas Helicopter 600N, N609RP, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Eagle Lake, Texas. The commercial pilot was uninjured, one passenger received serious injuries, and four passengers received minor injuries. The helicopter was operated as a public use flight for law enforcement training. The operator was providing flight services for law enforcement training at the time of the accident. The pilot, who was employed by the operator, stated that during the last flight of the evening, he flew the helicopter at an altitude of about 60 ft above ground level and at a speed of about 20 kts. He said that during the flight, he heard a bang, and the helicopter exhibited low rotor rpm and a partial loss of engine power. The pilot performed an autorotation, during which the helicopter was destroyed due to impact with terrain. The helicopter sustained damage to the fuselage, main rotor, and tailboom. The McDonnell Douglas Helicopter 600N has left and right fuel cells equipped with a baffle that separated the forward and aft portions of each fuel cell. The baffles are several inches in height but do not extend to the top of their respective fuel cells. Each baffle has a one-way flapper valve that allows fuel to flow from the forward portion to the aft portion of the fuel cell. Fuel is drawn from the left aft fuel cell. A start pump/boost pump is installed in the aft portion of the left fuel cell, which is also used in emergency procedures. Cross-feed tubes, a scavenge line, and a one-way flapper valve are installed to ensure the aft portion of the left fuel cell is continuously full of fuel so it can be supplied to the engine through suction for the engine-driven fuel pump. During recovery of the helicopter from the accident site, the only fuel recovered was about 19.5 gallons of fuel from the aft portion of the left fuel cell. Postaccident examination of the helicopter’s fuel system revealed that the that the installation drew fuel from the forward portion of the left fuel cell, rather than the rear portion. The fuel start/boost pump was not present and the electrical wires leading to the fuel start/boost pump had been cut and its loose ends were zip-tied. A download of recorded engine data was performed, followed by an examination of the engine and engine accessories. Engine control unit (ECU) data showed the ECU commanding the fuel metering valve to full open in response to declining main rotor speed. ECU data showed a reduced fuel flow to the engine until the helicopter impacted terrain. The pilot held a mechanic certificate with airframe and powerplant ratings and held inspection authorization. A review of maintenance logbook entries showed that the most recent maintenance of the helicopter’s fuel system was performed by the pilot and was dated July 10, 2024, for the installation of forward and aft fuel probes. The helicopter’s Illustrated Parts Catalog shows that the fuel probes are in the forward and aft portions of the left fuel tank. The operator was providing flight services to law enforcement for training purposes at the time of the accident. The pilot stated that during the last flight of the evening, he flew the helicopter at a low altitude and at a low airspeed when the helicopter exhibited low rotor rpm. The helicopter lost partial engine power, and the pilot performed a forced landing. The helicopter was destroyed by impact forces. Postaccident examination of the helicopter revealed the helicopter’s fuel system was incorrectly installed and drew fuel from the forward portion of the left fuel cell, allowing air to be drawn into the fuel system when the fuel level reached an unsustainable level for engine operation. A correct installation of the fuel system would have had fuel being drawn from the aft portion of the left fuel tanks, which had about 19.5 gallons of fuel available. Maintenance entries showed that the pilot, who was also a mechanic, performed recent maintenance within the left fuel cell and such maintenance would have required the pilot to remove and visually inspect the fuel system components within the left fuel cell that were found to be improperly installed. The improper installation resulted in the fuel system not scavenging the available fuel from the aft portion of the left fuel cell. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Fuel-Fluid level
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Installation-Maintenance personnel
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2024_CEN24LA271.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel starvation, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.