CHI00LA137
2000-05-14 · IONIA, Kansas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
N9198W has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (CESSNA 172R, built 2012), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the partial engine failure for undetermined reasons and the unsuitable terrain for landing encountered by the pilot. A factor to the accident was the hilly terrain condition.
Factual narrative
On May 14, 2000, at 0900 central daylight time, a Weatherly 201C, N9198W, owned and piloted by a commercial pilot, sustained substantial damage during an in-flight collision with the terrain, while executing a precautionary landing after a loss of engine power near Ionia, Kansas. The pilot was conducting aerial application operations at the time of the accident. Visual metrological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The aerial application flight was operating under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 137 and was not on a flight plan. The pilot, the sole occupant, reported no injuries. The accident flight departed a private airstrip near Burr Oak, Kansas, at 0815, for the local flight. According to the pilot's written statement, when he departed he had 23-gallons of useable fuel in the right tank and 39-gallons of useable fuel in the left tank. The pilot reported, "In app. [approximately] 45 min after take off the engine cut out restarted and run for app. 3 seconds, by pumping the thorotle [throttle] the engine restarted and run app 2-3 seconds[.] The right tank low fuel light came on when [the] engine first cut out." The pilot reported that the engine had been running off the left fuel tank for the entire flight up to the loss of engine power. The pilot continued, "I was flying app. 300 ft agl [above ground level]. The selector was move[d] back & forth from left to right a[t] least 3 times. By pumping the primer I was able to fly app 2.5 miles." The pilot stated that the area where he was flying was, "very rough ground (range land, with steep hills and deep draws...". The pilot elected to perform a precautionary landing and during landing the aircraft sustained substantial damage. The pilot reported that the expected fuel burn was 27-gallons per hour. A representative of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) conducted an on-scene examination of the wreckage on May 14, 2000. According to the inspectors statement, "Operation of the fuel selector revealed a detent in each position. The cowling was removed to gain access to the fuel selector valve, inspection revealed the valve installation was correct and operation appeared to be normal. Both wing tanks fuel quantity indicators were zero, the tanks were visually inspected and were empty. The pilot stated that after the accident, the fuel in the left tank had drained out during the night." The FAA inspector reported that he could not confirm or disprove the pilot's claim concerning the fuel leak, but noted that there was the smell of fuel at the accident site. The aircraft was transported to a maintenance facility and the fuel system was examined. FAA records indicate that the fuel system was inspected and no discrepancies were noted. A dented fuel line from the right tank to the fuel selector was identified, but an operational test of the line revealed no restriction of fuel flow from the right tank. While the pilot was conducting aerial application operations the engine lost partial power and the pilot elected to perform a precautionary landing after failed attempts to regain sustained engine power. The pilot landed in rough terrain and the aircraft was substantially damaged during the landing. The pilot reported that the flight was initiated 45-minutes prior to the loss of engine power. The pilot stated that the flight began with 39-gallons of fuel in the left tank and 23-gallons of fuel in the right tank. The pilot stated that he had been operating on the left tank since departure. The pilot reported that the expected fuel burn was 27-gallons per hour. Examination of the fuel system, including the fuel selector, revealed no anomalies. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2000_CHI00LA137.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, engine failure, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.