CHI02LA075
2002-01-30 · Ames, Iowa, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport AME
N66MT has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (LEARJET INC 45, built 2007), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to maintain the proper glide path during the final portion of the approach. Factors relating to this accident were the low altitude and the utility pole.
Factual narrative
On January 30, 2002, at 1810 central standard time, a Piper PA-42-720, N66MT, piloted by a commercial pilot, sustained substantial damage during an ILS approach for landing on runway 01 (5,700 feet by 100 feet, dry concrete) at the Ames Municipal Airport, Ames, Iowa, when the airplane struck a power pole, subsequent power lines, and then impacted the terrain. Night instrument meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The business flight was operating on an instrument flight rules plan under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot, a pilot-rated passenger in the right seat, and 5 passengers in the cabin reported no injuries. The cross-country flight originated in Denver, Colorado, at 1530 mountain standard time, and was en route to Ames, Iowa. In his written statement, the pilot said he was on the glide slope for the approach. The pilot said, "The auto pilot was coupled on to the approach. The autopilot also coupled on to the Glide slope. Approximately 2-1/2 to 3 miles out, we visually had approach lights and runway lights. I then disconnected the auto pilot and yaw damper, and hand flew a visual approach using the glide slope indicator as a cross check for a correct glide path to the airport. Continuing visually on the approach, I checked the GS (glide slope) and it indicated we were slightly above glide path, but was corrected, and seconds later hit a pole going through electrical wires, coming to rest short of the approach lights and to the right." A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector examined the airplane at the accident scene. The airplane had come to rest approximately 1/2 mile south of the approach end of the runway. Approximately 0.9 mile south of the approach end of the runway, a 26 foot high, 8 inch diameter power line pole was knocked over. Additional broken power poles and downed power lines were located 0.8 mile south of the runway. Tire marks in the terrain were observed approximately 0.7 mile south of the runway. The airplane was resting upright in a field and was oriented on an approximate magnetic heading of 160 degrees. An 8-inch wide, 12-inch deep gash was observed in the leading edge of the airplane's right wing, outboard of the engine nacelle. The right wing fuel tank was broken open. Soot and heat signatures were observed on the airplane's right wing, right side of the aft fuselage, right side of the vertical stabilizer, and on the outboard side of the right engine nacelle. A gash was observed in the leading edge of the left wing at approximately mid-span between the left engine nacelle and the wing tip. The right main landing gear and nose gear were broken aft. The top portion of the airplane's rudder was torn aft. Both propellers showed torsional bending and chordwise scratches. Flight control continuity was confirmed. An examination of the airplane's engines, engine controls, and other systems revealed no anomalies. On February 7, 2002, the FAA conducted a flight inspection of the ILS approach to runway 01 at the Ames Municipal Airport. The inspection showed the facility operated satisfactorily. The pilot said he was on the glide slope for an ILS approach. The pilot said, "The auto pilot was coupled on to the approach. The autopilot also coupled on to the Glide slope. Approximately 2-1/2 to 3 miles out, we visually had approach lights and runway lights. I then disconnected the auto pilot and yaw damper, and hand flew a visual approach using the glide slope indicator as a cross check for a correct glide path to the airport. Continuing visually on the approach, I checked the GS (glide slope) and it indicated we were slightly above glide path, but was corrected, and seconds later hit a pole going through electrical wires, coming to rest short of the approach lights and to the right." An examination of the airplane revealed no anomalies. An examination of the ILS approach to the runway showed the facility operated satisfactorily. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_CHI02LA075.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (autopilot). All research papers
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint ROSflight 2.0: Lean ROS 2-Based Autopilot for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
ROSflight is a lean, open-source autopilot ecosystem for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Designed by researchers for researchers, it is built to lower the barrier to entry to UAV research and acceler…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint ROSplane 2.0: A Fixed-Wing Autopilot for Research
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) research requires the integration of cutting-edge technology into existing autopilot frameworks.
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint A Data-Driven Autopilot for Fixed-Wing Aircraft Based on Model Predictive Control
Autopilots for fixed-wing aircraft are typically designed based on linearized aerodynamic models consisting of stability and control derivatives obtained from wind-tunnel testing.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Experimental Flight Testing of a Fault-Tolerant Adaptive Autopilot for Fixed-Wing Aircraft
This paper presents an adaptive autopilot for fixed-wing aircraft and compares its performance with a fixed-gain autopilot.
- arXiv 2021 · arXiv preprint An Adaptive Digital Autopilot for Fixed-Wing Aircraft with Actuator Faults
This paper develops an adaptive digital autopilot for a fixed-wing aircraft and compares its performance with a fixed-gain autopilot.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Robust Adaptive Sliding-Mode Control for Damaged Fixed-Wing UAVs
Many unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can remain aerodynamically flyable after sustaining structural or control surface damage, yet insufficient robustness in conventional autopilots often leads to mis…