NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CHI03LA087
Registry · N553RA
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CESSNA 172S
Year of manufacture
2012
Engine
LYCOMING IO-360-L2A (180 hp)
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20120723
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A70C08
Registrant of record
RICH AVIATION SERVICES LLC
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Fuel exhaustion due to the pilot's inadequate preflight and not verifying the airplane had been refueled.
Factual narrative
On March 20, 2003, at 0440 central standard time, an Aero Commander 500-B, N553RA, operated by Central Air Southwest, sustained substantial damage when the nose gear collapsed after it experienced a loss of power to both engines and executed a forced landing to a dirt road about 4 miles south of the Mankato Regional Airport (MKT), Mankato, Minnesota. The pilot was not injured. The Title 14 CFR Part 91 positioning flight departed Des Moines International Airport (DSM), Des Moines, Iowa, at 0338, and was en route to the Downtown St. Paul Airport (STP), St. Paul, Minnesota. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed. The flight was on an instrument flight plan. The fuel log of the fixed base operator (FBO) at Eppley Airfield (OMA), Omaha, Nebraska, where the airplane was last serviced, indicated that N553RA was fueled on March 18, 2003, at 2126, with 90.1 gallons of fuel. There were no entries in the fuel log that indicated N533RA had been fueled on March 19th. The airplane was not flown until the pilot departed on March 19th, at 2240. The pilot reported for duty at 2000, March 19th. He reported that he requested the FBO fuel N533RA. The pilot reported that he checked the oil during the preflight, but he did not observed the airplane being fueled. The pilot reported that prior to departure, he checked the fuel level in the wing tanks. He reported that he stuck his fingers into the fuel tanks to check for fuel, but did not feel any fuel. He reported he looked at the fuel gauges and they indicated the tanks were full. The pilot reported that the fuel gauges would indicate full when the tanks had about 120 gallons of fuel, even though the fuel tanks held 156 gallons. He reported that he did not have a fuel receipt because the fuel was billed directly to the company. The pilot reported that he departed OMA on March 19, 2003, at 2240, on a Part 135 cargo flight to DSM. The airplane flew one instrument approach and landed in DSM about 2320. The Part 135 flight did not depart to Rochester, Minnesota, at the scheduled time of 0245, due to weather. Instead, the flight departed on its Part 91 positioning flight to STP at 0338. While en route to STP, the pilot notified air traffic control (ATC) that the airplane's fuel gauges were indicating low fuel. The pilot attempted a VOR instrument approach to the Albert Lee Municipal Airport, Albert Lee, Minnesota, but executed a missed approach due to low ceilings and visibility. ATC issued the pilot radar vectors and a clearance for the approach to MKT. The pilot was flying the ILS Runway 33 instrument approach to MKT when both engines lost power and he executed a forced landing. The pilot landed the airplane on a dirt road, but the nose gear collapsed during the landing roll. An inspection of the fuel tanks revealed that the wing tanks were empty, and the fuselage tank had 5 quarts of fuel. An inspection of the airplane revealed no fuel leaks. The Hobbs meter indicated the airplane had flown 1.8 hours since departing OMA. A Federal Aviation Administration operations inspector interviewed the pilot. The pilot reported to the inspector that he had "run the airplane out of gas." The Director of Operations of Central Air Southwest reported that the N533RA held 156 gallons of fuel. He reported that the airplane, fueled with 90 gallons of fuel, had about a 3 hour endurance range. The company's Operation Manual stated the following concerning fueling of aircraft: "The PIC is responsible for ensuring that the aircraft has the required quantity of fuel for the proposed flight and fueled as specified in Aircraft Fueling Procedures on page B5 of the Operations Manual." The Operations Manual, "Aircraft Refueling Procedures," stated the following: "No company aircraft will be fueled unless a pilot or other company employee, experienced in aircraft fueling, is present..….The pilot shall determine the quantity of fuel to be added to the aircraft and that the aircraft is properly grounded." The airplane sustained substantial damage when it experienced a loss of power to both engines and executed a forced landing at night to a dirt road about 4 miles south of the airport. The Part 135 cargo flight could not depart to its scheduled destination due to weather, so it departed on a Part 91 positioning flight to another destination. While en route, the pilot notified ATC that the airplane's fuel gauges were indicating low fuel. The pilot attempted a VOR instrument approach to a nearby airport, but was unsuccessful. ATC issued the pilot radar vectors and a clearance for the ILS approach to another airport. While flying the approach, both engines lost power and the pilot executed a forced landing. The pilot reported that he requested the local fixed base operator to fuel the airplane. The pilot did not observe the airplane being refueled, nor did he receive a fuel receipt. He reported that when he preflighted the airplane, he checked the fuel tanks by feeling for fuel with his fingers. He could not feel any fuel with his finger. He checked the fuel gauges and reported that the fuel gauges read FULL. He reported that the fuel gauges would read FULL when there might be only 120 gallons of fuel, even though the fuel tanks held 156 gallons. An inspection of the fuel tanks at the accident site revealed that the wing tanks were empty, and the fuselage tank had 5 quarts of fuel. An inspection of the airplane revealed no fuel leaks. The company's Operations Manual, "Aircraft Refueling Procedures," stated: "No company aircraft will be fueled unless a pilot or other company employee, experienced in aircraft fueling, is present.…..The pilot shall determine the quantity of fuel to be added to the aircraft and that the aircraft is properly grounded." Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_CHI03LA087.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel exhaustion). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- AOPA Air Safety Institute 2023 · Safety advisor
Safety Advisor: Fuel Awareness
AOPA Air Safety Institute safety advisor on preventing fuel-exhaustion and fuel-starvation accidents in general aviation. Covers pre-flight fuel planning, reserve requirements (14 CFR 91.151, 91.167),…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Abstract
U.S. Civil Rotorcraft Accidents, 1963 through 1997
The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has recorded 8,436 rotorcraft accidents during the period mid - 1963 through the end of 1997.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
A study of carburetor/induction system icing in general aviation accidents
An assessment of the frequency and severity of carburetor/induction icing in general-aviation accidents was performed. The available literature and accident data from the National Transportation Safet…
- NASA NTRS 2018 · Other
Parachuting to Safety
NASA's Langley Research Center awarded Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc., three Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) contracts to research and develop a new, low cost, lightweight recovery system …
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗