CHI03LA177
2003-06-22 · Battle Creek, Michigan, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport BTL
Current FAA registration · N20953
- Make / Model
- WACO ARE
- Year of manufacture
- 1939 · 64 years old at event
- Engine
- JACOBS L6 (330 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 5 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19560429
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A1B695
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The inadequate material used in the landing gear cross supports leading to its collapse during the landing roll.
Factual narrative
On June 22, 2003, about 1215 eastern daylight time, a Waco ARE, N20953, piloted by a private pilot, sustained substantial damage on impact with runway 23 during a landing roll at W K Kellogg Airport (BTL), near Battle Creek, Michigan. The personal flight was operating under 14 CFR Part 91. No flight plan was on file. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The pilot reported no injuries. The flight originated in St Louis, Missouri at 0915 and was landing at BTL at the time of the accident. The pilot reported: Weather was clear with winds variable at 5 kts; not a factor. ... Landing touchdown was smooth, normal, on centerline. Landed on the mains with the tail down slightly, aircraft tracked straight. As aircraft continued to slow, the tailwheel was lowered onto the ground. Ground roll continued, aircraft came to the left a bit, inputted a little right rudder to correct. At this point, there was a sudden and strong learch forward. Aircraft quickly came to a stop on the runway, near centerline. Aircraft came to rest in pitched down, left wing low attitude with the left lower wingtip on the ground. ... Upon walking around the airplane, found the left main gear had collapsed and swung completely under the forward fuselage and rested against the right main gear. A Federal Aviation Administration Inspector examined the airplane. The inspector stated: Further inspection of the landing gear cross supports did not show any apparent pre-existing conditions to cause failure. The metal evident in the exposed crack areas did not have any signs of rust. Subsequent to the accident, the pilot determined that the cross support material used in the landing gear structure was not in accordance with the original design specifications. The original drawings on file at the Smithsonian Institute showed that the original wall thickness was greater than the failed material. The pilot stated that the airplane was repaired using the wall thickness specified in the original drawings. The airplane sustained substantial damage on impact with the runway during landing roll. The pilot reported that weather was clear with winds variable at 5 kts and was not a factor. The pilot stated, "Ground roll continued, aircraft came to the left a bit, inputted a little right rudder to correct. At this point, there was a sudden and strong learch forward. Aircraft quickly came to a stop on the runway, near centerline. Aircraft came to rest in pitched down, left wing low attitude with the left lower wingtip on the ground. ... Upon walking around the airplane, found the left main gear had collapsed and swung completely under the forward fuselage and rested against the right main gear." A post-accident inspection revealed that the left main gear cross-support had failed. An examination revealed that the landing gear cross supports did not show any apparent pre-existing conditions. The metal evident in the exposed crack areas did not have any signs of rust. Subsequent to the accident, the pilot determined that the cross support material used in the landing gear structure was not in accordance with the original design specifications. The original drawings on file at the Smithsonian Institute showed that the original wall thickness was greater than the failed material. The pilot stated that the airplane was repaired using the wall thickness specified in the original drawings. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_CHI03LA177.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type. All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Uncertainty-Aware Conflict Detection Against Operator-Conditioned Weather Hazards
Strategic flight plan validation in Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) environments requires robust methods for predicting aircraft state uncertainty and detecting potential conflicts with dynamic airspace h…
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Designing, Deployment and Field Testing of C2Stack for Networked Intelligent Software-Defined UAVs
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are emerging as critical enablers of next-generation wireless networking and autonomous systems.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint FlyBlind: Cross-Slice Timeliness Attacks on UAV Situational Awareness over 5G
Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS) operating over 5G Standalone (SA) networks use a shared User Plane for both command-and-control (C2) data and video feedback.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Geometry-Aware DRL for Multi-Subband Scheduling in Satellite-Assisted UAM Networks
In this paper, we investigate downlink scheduling for urban air mobility (UAM) in a cooperative space-air-ground integrated network.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Online Monitoring and Risk Assessment of Non-Cooperative UAVs via STL-Aware Adaptive Fusion Kalman Filtering
This paper considers the problem of online state estimation and predictive risk assessment for non-cooperative unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the presence of asynchronous heterogeneous sensing and…
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Physics-Aware End-to-End Deep Reinforcement Learning for Quadcopter Control with Actuator Dynamics
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), particularly quadcopters, present unique challenges for autonomous control due to their underactuated dynamics: only four available control inputs must govern six degr…