CHI05CA035
2004-11-21 · Anderson, Indiana, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport AID
Current FAA registration · N967SA
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 172S
- Year of manufacture
- 2002 · 2 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING IO-360-L2A (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20020411
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AD77B8
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The student pilot's improper flare and his inadequate recovery from a bounced landing.
Factual narrative
On November 21, 2004, about 1525 eastern standard time, a Cessna 172S, N967SA, piloted by a student pilot, sustained substantial damage during a hard landing on runway 30 (5,400 feet by 100 feet, dry asphalt) at the Anderson Municipal Airport-Darlington Field (AID), near Anderson, Indiana. The solo instructional flight was operating under 14 CFR Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The pilot reported that a visual flight rules flight plan was filed and that he sustained no injuries. The flight originated from the South Bend Regional Airport, near South Bend, Indiana, at 1400. The pilot's accident report stated: I approached AID 30 runway per instructions from tower. On initial final I was high relative to glide slope indicator showing 4 white lights. At that time airspeed was about 75 kias (faster than desired 68), flaps were at 30, and engine rpms were 1300- 1400 (below target, with intent to bring plane to glide slope). I held nose up to slow plane. These tactics had the plane at 70-72 kias and on glide slope one or two markers out from threshold. I expected that I would have to arrest downward momentum more than usual, so I set my touchdown point further down the runway to the first bars on the runway. I heard the stall horn before initial contact with the runway. The intention was to bleed the excess speed and momentum sacrificing runway distance as the runway was 5400 feet. Given the downward momentum and the speed, I expected the first bounce and its magnitude, which I estimated to be 1-2 feet. I maintained the pitch and flair for the second contact. I heard the stall horn before second contact. I was surprised by the magnitude of the second bounce, which I estimated to be 5-6 feet. I added power to flatten the porpoise-condition, and retained the yoke in position. There was a brief delay in moving one hand from the yoke to the throttle plus the delay in recognition of the magnitude of the bounce and porpoising effect. However, it appears to me that at the time I added power, I was already in the downward arc of the porpoise. Adding power did little in that instant but drive the front down faster before the elevators could provide lift. I felt like I had a hard three-point landing or had struck the nose wheel first. I believe the propeller struck during the third contact, but I was not aware of it having happened then. The bounce from that contact was back to 1-2 feet reflecting the countermeasures of increased throttle and yoke/pitch that I had already put in place. The fourth contact was the final and I continued to roll. The Anderson tower appears to have been unaware of any incident (other than possibly a sloppy landing) because he simply instructed me to the taxi way and ramp. It was not until I stopped at Law Aviation and shutdown the engine that I noticed the bent prop. The bend was approximately 3" long on both ends and pointed in the direction of the cockpit/cowling. Neither I nor the line man who directed me in to the T, noticed any different engine sounds, or upon further inspection, other damage. The airplane, piloted by a student pilot, sustained substantial damage during a hard landing. The pilot stated that he propoised four times. He said, "I was surprised by the magnitude of the second bounce, which I estimated to be 5-6 feet. I added power to flatten the porpoise-condition, and retained the yoke in position. There was a brief delay in moving one hand from the yoke to the throttle plus the delay in recognition of the magnitude of the bounce and porpoising effect. However, it appears to me that at the time I added power, I was already in the downward arc of the porpoise. Adding power did little in that instant but drive the front down faster before the elevators could provide lift. I felt like I had a hard three-point landing or had struck the nose wheel first. I believe the propeller struck during the third contact, but I was not aware of it having happened then." Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2004_CHI05CA035.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall). All research papers
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR) An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Publication (TP) NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program: Flight Test Report
This report presents results from research flights that explored the characteristics of an ice-contaminated tailplane using various simulated ice shapes attached to the leading edge of the horizontal …
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Other [Tail Plane Icing]
The Aviation Safety Program initiated by NASA in 1997 has put greater emphasis in safety related research activities. Ice-contaminated-tailplane stall (ICTS) has been identified by the NASA Lewis Icin…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA) Airport Policing in Pakistan: Structure, Training, and Issue
Airports are strategically and economically important installations of any country. Airports are the gateway of any country and any incidents at these gateways may harm the very aspects of a country i…