CHI07LA159
2007-05-30 · Middleton, Wisconsin, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport C29
Current FAA registration · N17MH
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 340
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 2 engines
- Last airworthiness date
- 19790927
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A117EF
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Failure of the right main landing gear extension and retraction linkage, which allowed the gear assembly to collapse during landing rollout. An additional cause was the improper adjustment procedure(s) by undetermined mechanic(s). The runway lights struck during the accident sequence were contributing factors.
Factual narrative
On May 30, 2007, about 1550 central daylight time, a Cessna 340A, N17MH, piloted by a private pilot and flight instructor, was substantially damaged when the right main landing gear collapsed during landing on runway 28 (4,000 feet by 150 feet, asphalt) at the Middleton Municipal Airport (C29), Middleton, Wisconsin. The local proficiency flight was operating under 14 CFR Part 91 without a flight plan. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The pilot and flight instructor were not injured. The flight originally departed C29 and executed multiple instrument approaches and landings at local airports prior to the accident. The takeoff prior to the accident was from the Dane County Regional Airport (MSN), located approximately 10 miles east of C29, about 1540. The private pilot reported that the objective of the day's flying was to regain proficiency in Cessna 340 operations under the supervision of a flight instructor. They conducted multiple approaches and landings at local airports prior to the accident. Regarding the accident landing, the private pilot stated that during the approach he observed three green lights indicating that the landing gear was properly extended. He also noted that the landing gear warning horn was silent. The landing was "light, at blue line, on track" with proper inputs for a left crosswind, according to the private pilot. He reported that a "few seconds" after touchdown the aircraft began to "shudder" and the gear horn started to sound. He noted that the right main landing gear light was no longer illuminated and the red gear unsafe light was illuminated. The private pilot stated that the aircraft began to drift right and the right wing began to settle. As the right main gear collapsed, the airplane ultimately departed the runway pavement, striking two runway lights in the process. The airplane came to rest in a grass area adjacent to the runway. The nose and left main landing gear remained extended during the accident. The fuselage was punctured by blade fragments from the right propeller assembly. A post accident examination of the airplane revealed that the forward bellcrank attachment flange on the landing gear strut had failed. In addition, the lower flange on the bellcrank had also failed. No other anomalies were noted. The remaining landing gear assemblies remained intact. Review of the airplane maintenance records revealed that the most recent annual inspection was completed on January 12, 2007. At the time of that inspection, the airplane had accumulated 4,575 hours total flight time. The maintenance log entry indicated that the landing gear system was inspected and adjusted at that time. The right main landing gear downlock tension did not initially meet the specification when checked. The maintenance log entry stated: "Check gear tensions, right main [too] high, adjust torque tube push rod and adjust down lock arm length . . . shorten down lock arm and pops in locked position correctly." The airplane service manual stated that landing gear downlock spring tension was to be inspected at the Side Brace Lock Link/Bellcrank joint. In the event that the tension was too high, the corresponding push-pull tube was to be lengthened until the correct tension was obtained. Any change in the push-pull tube length would normally require a corresponding adjustment to the fork bolt, in order to maintain the proper landing gear position when retracted. According to the airplane manufacturer, the location of the failures was consistent with the cumulative effect of improper adjustment of the downlock mechanism over time. However, any improper adjustment procedure could not be attributed to any specific maintenance action or to a particular mechanic. The maintenance log entry related to the adjustments made during the most recent annual inspection appeared to comply with the airplane maintenance manual instructions. The pilot stated that multiple approaches and landings had been conducted during the dual proficiency flight. Prior to the accident landing, he observed three green lights indicating that the landing gear was properly extended. The landing touchdown was "light." A "few seconds" after touchdown the aircraft began to "shudder" and the gear horn started to sound. The airplane began to drift right and the right wing began to settle. As the right main gear collapsed, the aircraft departed the runway pavement, striking two runway lights in the process. The aircraft came to rest in a grass area adjacent to the runway. The nose and left main landing gear remained extended during the accident. A post accident examination of the aircraft revealed that the forward bellcrank attachment flange on the landing gear strut failed. In addition, the lower flange on the bellcrank had also failed. According to the airplane manufacturer, the location of the failures was consistent with the cumulative effect of improper adjustment of the downlock mechanism over time. However, any improper adjustment procedure could not be attributed to any specific maintenance action or to a particular mechanic. Additionally, the maintenance log entry related to the adjustments made during the most recent annual inspection indicated that the airplane maintenance manual instructions regarding landing gear adjustments were complied with properly. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2007_CHI07LA159.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…